&lt;title&gt;Developments in autosterioscopic technology at Dimension Technologies Inc.&lt;/title&gt;

Eichenlaub, Jesse B.

doi:10.1117/12.157037

“…Most mobile 3D displays technologies are autostereoscopic (the user does not need any eyewear) and also are multiview displays (deliver several views to different view-zones). The most common approaches used to achieve these capabilities are parallax barriers [10], lenticular arrays [27] and directional backlighting [38].…”

Section: Analysis Of Mobile 3d Display Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Portallax

Plasencia

¹

,

Karnik

²

,

Muñoz

³

et al. 2014

Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices &Amp; Services

3

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present Portallax, a clip-on technology to retrofit mobile devices with 3D display capabilities. Available technologies (e.g. Nintendo 3DS or LG Optimus) and clipon solutions (e.g. 3DeeSlide and Grilli3D) force users to have a fixed head and device positions. This is contradictory to the nature of a mobile scenario, and limits the usage of interaction techniques such as tilting the device to control a game. Portallax uses an actuated parallax barrier and face tracking to realign the barrier's position to the user's position. This allows us to provide stereo, motion parallax and perspective correction cues in 60 degrees in front of the device. Our optimized design of the barrier minimizes colour distortion, maximizes resolution and produces bigger view-zones, which support ~81% of adults' interpupillary distances and allow eye tracking implemented with the front camera. We present a reference implementation, evaluate its key features and provide example applications illustrating the potential of Portallax.

show abstract

“…It has long been known 12 how to make a two-view autostereoscopic display using either parallax barrier 13 or lenticular sheet 14 technology. These divide, into two sets, the horizontal resolution of the underlying, typically liquid crystal, display device.…”

Section: Two-view Displaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the number of viewing zones required for head-tracked autostereoscopic display

Dodgson¹

2021

Preprint

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A head-tracked display could be made from a two-view autostereoscopic display where head-tracking allows the display to swap the two views when the eyes move from viewing zone to viewing zone. Variations in human interpupillary distance mean that this basic two-view version will not work well for the significant minority of the population who have interpupillary distance significantly different from the average. Woodgate et al. proposed, in 1997, that a three-view system would work well. Analysis of an ideal version of their proposal shows that it does work well for the vast majority of the population. However, most multi-view, multi-lobe autostereoscopic displays have drawbacks which mean that, in practice, such a system would be unacceptable because of the inter-view dark zones generated by the inter-pixel dark zones on the underlying display technology. Variations of such displays have been developed which remove the inter-view dark zones by allowing adjacent views to overlap with one another: the views appear to smoothly blend from one to the next at the expense of a little blurring. Such displays need at least five viewing zones to accommodate the majority of the adult population with head-tracking and at least six viewing zones to accommodate everyone. © 2006 SPIE-IS&T.

show abstract

“…It has long been known 12 how to make a two-view autostereoscopic display using either parallax barrier 13 or lenticular sheet 14 technology. These divide, into two sets, the horizontal resolution of the underlying, typically liquid crystal, display device.…”

Section: Two-view Displaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the number of viewing zones required for head-tracked autostereoscopic display

Dodgson¹

2020

Preprint

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A head-tracked display could be made from a two-view autostereoscopic display where head-tracking allows the display to swap the two views when the eyes move from viewing zone to viewing zone. Variations in human interpupillary distance mean that this basic two-view version will not work well for the significant minority of the population who have interpupillary distance significantly different from the average. Woodgate et al. proposed, in 1997, that a three-view system would work well. Analysis of an ideal version of their proposal shows that it does work well for the vast majority of the population. However, most multi-view, multi-lobe autostereoscopic displays have drawbacks which mean that, in practice, such a system would be unacceptable because of the inter-view dark zones generated by the inter-pixel dark zones on the underlying display technology. Variations of such displays have been developed which remove the inter-view dark zones by allowing adjacent views to overlap with one another: the views appear to smoothly blend from one to the next at the expense of a little blurring. Such displays need at least five viewing zones to accommodate the majority of the adult population with head-tracking and at least six viewing zones to accommodate everyone. © 2006 SPIE-IS&T.

show abstract

<title>Developments in autosterioscopic technology at Dimension Technologies Inc.</title>

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Portallax

Portallax

On the number of viewing zones required for head-tracked autostereoscopic display

On the number of viewing zones required for head-tracked autostereoscopic display

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About