1995
DOI: 10.1117/12.220925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Practical testing of the precision and accuracy of target image centering algorithms</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Three of the more common centroid detection techniques were chosen for study -two variations on a weighted centroid method, and a Gaussian least squares fit method. The basic algorithms are intensity based techniques and have been previously studied as part of a broader evaluation for target centroiding precision 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of the more common centroid detection techniques were chosen for study -two variations on a weighted centroid method, and a Gaussian least squares fit method. The basic algorithms are intensity based techniques and have been previously studied as part of a broader evaluation for target centroiding precision 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple centroid was computed from the pixels belonging to a target. This method has been reported to give a good sub-pixel accuracy (Shortis et al, 1995).…”
Section: Trigger Detectionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Localizing the targets is then a trivial task as they are highly contrasted against the remaining image content. Once the points are localized, their centers are typically found with centroiding methods, ellipse fitting or correlation (Shortis et al, 1995, Otepka, 2004, Wiora et al, 2004, Burgess et al, 2011. In tracking applications, physical environment often precludes a complete detection and localization of points.…”
Section: Target Motion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%