2017
DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung cancer incidence attributable to residential radon exposure in Alberta in 2012

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to current estimates by the US Environment protection agency (EPA), each year approximately 21,000 lung cancer deaths in the United States are associated with radon exposure [ 4 ]. In 2012, 17% of lung cancer cases in Alberta were found to be attributable to residential radon exposure [ 10 ]. Occupational exposure to high concentrations of radon have also been demonstrated to increase the risk of lung cancer in nonsmokers [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to current estimates by the US Environment protection agency (EPA), each year approximately 21,000 lung cancer deaths in the United States are associated with radon exposure [ 4 ]. In 2012, 17% of lung cancer cases in Alberta were found to be attributable to residential radon exposure [ 10 ]. Occupational exposure to high concentrations of radon have also been demonstrated to increase the risk of lung cancer in nonsmokers [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study conducted in Alberta in 2011 estimated the population’s attributable risk of lung cancer due to radon exposure: it was higher among those who had never smoked than among ever-smokers. However, since only approximately 10% of lung cancer cases occur in nonsmokers, the estimated total number of excess cases was higher for ever smokers than for never smokers [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We give comparisons between the UK and Alberta populations at the exposure-specific level in our previous articles. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] In Australia, about 32% of cancers in 2010 were estimated to be attributable to 13 modifiable factors. 29 This estimate is lower than both our estimate for Alberta and the UK estimate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 As some factors were considered protective for cancer and others were cancer risk factors, Table 1 summarizes what we consider to be the theoretical minimum risk level of exposure for each lifestyle and environmental factor based on our research (unpublished data). [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] We estimated the total number of cancer cases attributable to the 24 risk factors by summing the number of cases of cancer at individual sites attributable to each individual exposure. Additional methods for the exposures included in this summary paper but not presented in separate exposure-specific papers are presented in Appendix 1, available at www.cmajopen.ca/ content/5/3/E540/suppl/DC1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%