2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung cancer screening with CT: Evaluation of radiologists and different computer assisted detection software (CAD) as first and second readers for lung nodule detection at different dose levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection rates in this study were similar to a prior lung phantom study that showed a detection rate of 91% for standard CT acquisition and 97% of standard acquisition with CAD [18], and also to studies investigating CT acquisitions of real patients, such as the study of Veronesi et al that showed a sensitivity of 90% with a standard lung CT protocol [27]. A recent study by Doo et al, using exactly the same anthropomorphic chest phantom as the present study, investigated the detectability of 5 mm and 8 mm ground-glass nodules (-630 and -800 HU) with a low-dose acquisition and iterative construction (effective does of 0.47 mSv) [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detection rates in this study were similar to a prior lung phantom study that showed a detection rate of 91% for standard CT acquisition and 97% of standard acquisition with CAD [18], and also to studies investigating CT acquisitions of real patients, such as the study of Veronesi et al that showed a sensitivity of 90% with a standard lung CT protocol [27]. A recent study by Doo et al, using exactly the same anthropomorphic chest phantom as the present study, investigated the detectability of 5 mm and 8 mm ground-glass nodules (-630 and -800 HU) with a low-dose acquisition and iterative construction (effective does of 0.47 mSv) [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Various secondary read-out tools exist that can increase the detection rate for small lung nodules, such as the use of maximum intensity projections (MIP) [17] or computer-aided detection (CAD) software [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, anthropomorphic lung phantom and artificial lung nodules were used and studied to simulate screening CT-examination at standard dose and 8 different low dose levels. Two radiologists and 3 different computer aided detection software (CAD) were paired to find the highest sensitivity [18]. Qingzhu Wang et al (2013) detected lung nodules using computeraided detection by SVM based on 3D matrix patterns.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to overcome this limitation is with the use of a lung phantom containing artificial nodules. 9,10 Images of the phantom acquired with the same scan/reconstruction parameters as those used for screening are then subjected to CAD. This approach is effective for assessing site-specific CAD performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%