2021
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215121000621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lymph node yield in treatment naïve cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: en bloc lymphadenectomy versus level-by-level dissection

Abstract: Background Lymph node yield is an important prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Variability in neck dissection sampling techniques has not been studied as a determinant of lymph node yield. Methods This retrospective study used lymph node yield and average nodes per level to compare level-by-level and en bloc neck dissection sampling methods, in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cases operated between March 2017 and February 2020. Results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we have excluded lymph nodes only visible in one transverse MRI slice, lymph nodes with a transverse diameter < 2 mm and lymph nodes suspect of containing metastases. Also the pathological determination of lymph node yield in neck dissections cannot be considered the gold standard as the lymph node yield is affected by the dissection technique ( 17 ) and the person who is performing the dissection (pathologist vs. technician) ( 15 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we have excluded lymph nodes only visible in one transverse MRI slice, lymph nodes with a transverse diameter < 2 mm and lymph nodes suspect of containing metastases. Also the pathological determination of lymph node yield in neck dissections cannot be considered the gold standard as the lymph node yield is affected by the dissection technique ( 17 ) and the person who is performing the dissection (pathologist vs. technician) ( 15 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The horizontal neck dissection using standard fascia unwrapping technique was associated with a significantly superior nodal yield in levels I, II, III, and IV, and in overall nodal yield than the vertical neck dissection in the control group [24]. Level-by-level neck dissection resulted in a statistically significant higher LNY than en bloc or monoblock neck dissection in both selective neck dissection and individual neck levels [32]. Surgical experience influences not only LNY in neck dissections but also oncological outcomes with more recurrences occurring with less-experienced surgeons [25].…”
Section: Factors Influencing Lnymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, the current literature has moved towards superselective neck dissection, adding more difficulty. For this reason, separating neck dissection specimens into the individual neck levels before being sent for the histopathological examination should be recommended in the future guidelines to establish standard LNY values in different neck levels and, therefore, to assess the adequacy of neck dissection [30,32].…”
Section: Variations In Lnymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lymph node yield from neck dissection has also been associated with the survival outcome for HNSCC patients [ 13 , 14 ]. A lymph node yield ≥ 18 was significantly associated with both decreased recurrence and improved survival [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%