2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.647783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Driven Profiling of Cerebrospinal Fluid Core Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Neurological Disorders

Abstract: Amyloid-beta (Aβ) 42/40 ratio, tau phosphorylated at threonine-181 (p-tau), and total-tau (t-tau) are considered core biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The use of fully automated biomarker assays has been shown to reduce the intra- and inter-laboratory variability, which is a critical factor when defining cut-off values. The calculation of cut-off values is often influenced by the composition of AD and control groups. Indeed, the clinically defined AD group may include patients affected… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, found levels for this cut-off point were between 0.059 and 0.073. 24,27 In general, small differences in these biomarkers' levels were found in comparison with other studies. Actually, it could be explained by the use of different analytical methods and the differences in the cohorts (age, status, inclusion of other dementias or neurological diseases).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature, found levels for this cut-off point were between 0.059 and 0.073. 24,27 In general, small differences in these biomarkers' levels were found in comparison with other studies. Actually, it could be explained by the use of different analytical methods and the differences in the cohorts (age, status, inclusion of other dementias or neurological diseases).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…For the ratio Aβ42/Aβ40, the cut‐off was 0.0695 which was very close to the results from João‐Leitão (0.068). In the literature, found levels for this cut‐off point were between 0.059 and 0.073 24,27 . In general, small differences in these biomarkers' levels were found in comparison with other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Here, we did not consider clustering approach [ 25 ] allowing to include all samples (i.e., all demented patients) in the analysis because the cohort is quite small, particularly also the group of other dementias, to foresee relevant results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NC were cognitively unimpaired subjects referring to the Centre for Memory Disturbances of the University of Perugia (Perugia, Italy), who underwent lumbar puncture for subjective memory complaints not confirmed by the neuropsychological assessment, or as part of a diagnostic work-up for minor neurological symptoms (i.e., headache, peripheral neuropathy, psychiatric disorders), showing no cognitive impairment after at least a 2-year follow-up. All the selected NC samples tested negative for both classical AD CSF biomarkers (amyloid 1–40 and 1–42 peptides ratio, total tau, and T181-phosphorylated tau) [ 18 ] and for α-syn SAA [ 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%