2022 12th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science &Amp; Engineering (Confluence) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/confluence52989.2022.9734152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning (ML) based Human Activity Recognition Model using Smart Sensors in IoT Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were acquired from BioBeats (http://biobeats.com) that generates IoT wearable devices for heart rate signal monitoring and offering feedback accordingly. In this section we mainly focus on the state of methods and results of the proposed SPR-SVIAL method with the existing HAR_WCNN [1] and IoT-based human activity monitoring model [2] for Smart Healthcare Monitoring. Assessment metrics employed for analyzing the performance of both proposed and existing methods are listed as follows:…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The data were acquired from BioBeats (http://biobeats.com) that generates IoT wearable devices for heart rate signal monitoring and offering feedback accordingly. In this section we mainly focus on the state of methods and results of the proposed SPR-SVIAL method with the existing HAR_WCNN [1] and IoT-based human activity monitoring model [2] for Smart Healthcare Monitoring. Assessment metrics employed for analyzing the performance of both proposed and existing methods are listed as follows:…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 4 demonstrates the smart healthcare monitoring time by means of the three different methods, SPR-SVIAL, HAR_WCNN [1] and IoT-based human activity monitoring model [2]. As shown in the above figure, 5000 instances were acquired from 22 different participants contains both male and female.…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of Smart Health Monitoring Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also showed the method of classification adopted in the treatment. [25] SVM-Gaussian kerne 96.50% De Leonardis et al [26] K-nearest neighbor -feedforward neural network -SVM -decision tree -Naïve Bayes 97.00% Nurhanim et al [27] SVM polynomial kernel -one versus all 98.57% Agarwal and Alam [28] SVMs-k-nearest neighbor-linear discriminant analysis 98.00% Minarno et al [29] SVM+LR 98.00% Jindal et al [30] SVM, KNN, and LR 92.78% Patel and Shah [31] Long short-term, LR 92.00% Navita and Mittal [32] SVM 98.03% Figure 6. Model accuracy scores…”
Section: Machine Learning Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%