1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00462-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macleod Revisited: Sperm Count Distributions in 374 Fertile Men From 1971 to 1994

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Declines of 40 -50% have been depicted in American and European men (Becker and Berhane, 1997;Carlsen et al, 1992). Further analysis has disclosed that sampling biases Saidi et al, 1999), changes in clinical norms (Bromwich et al, 1994), variation in quantitative methods (Emanuel et al, 1998), and unsuitable statistical analyses (Olsen et al, 1995) may underlie many of the reported differences. In addition, there is no reason to believe that according to clinical standards, any compromise in male fecundity has occurred, even if these declines are valid.…”
Section: Sperm Countmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Declines of 40 -50% have been depicted in American and European men (Becker and Berhane, 1997;Carlsen et al, 1992). Further analysis has disclosed that sampling biases Saidi et al, 1999), changes in clinical norms (Bromwich et al, 1994), variation in quantitative methods (Emanuel et al, 1998), and unsuitable statistical analyses (Olsen et al, 1995) may underlie many of the reported differences. In addition, there is no reason to believe that according to clinical standards, any compromise in male fecundity has occurred, even if these declines are valid.…”
Section: Sperm Countmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] By contrast, other studies have shown no evidence of deteriorating semen quality. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Some studies concern infertile couples, while others analyse normal sperm parameters. Thus, a worldwide decreasing trend in semen parameter values can be neither confirmed nor rejected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the paper generated a great deal of media attention, it has been repeatedly criticized in the scientific community for its many methodological flaws. [9][10][11][12][13] These flaws include: high cross-study variability in the methods and protocols used for sperm collection and measurement; lack of control for period of abstinence, cigarette smoking or recreational drug use; failure to include some studies reporting no decline in semen parameters; and failure to account for geographic variation between studies.…”
Section: Critical Analysis Of An Influential Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When these tools are applied to the Carlsen data, mean sperm concentrations have actually increased since 1940. 12 In the two decades since publication of Carlsen's paper, at least 35 major studies of time trends in semen parameters have been published. Eight (on a total of 18 109 men) suggest a decline in semen parameter values (Table 1); 21 (on a total of 112 386 men) show either no change or an increase in semen quality ( Table 2); and six (on a total of 26 007 men) show ambiguous or conflicting results ( Table 3).…”
Section: Critical Analysis Of An Influential Papermentioning
confidence: 99%