2014
DOI: 10.4102/aej.v2i1.86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macro and micro determinants of project performance

Abstract: One year from the target date of the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the result in Africa is only a work in progress. Africa has made progress towards some of the MDGs but needs to draw lessons and improve performance post 2015. This study investigates the development effectiveness of the African Development Bank Group-financed projects using 229 concluded projects between 2004 and 2012 to assess the major determinants of project performance. The study finds that the Bank Group has on a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is robust among different reliability tests. This result contributes to the ongoing discussion on the determinants of the performance of development projects (see Assefa et al, 2014;Bulman et al, 2017;Denizer et al, 2013;Feeny & Vuong, 2017), in particular as it sheds light on a country-level determinant which has been largely left out of existing studies. In so doing, Figure 1 highlights the importance of using indicators that correspond with the research question, especially for complex topics like corruption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is robust among different reliability tests. This result contributes to the ongoing discussion on the determinants of the performance of development projects (see Assefa et al, 2014;Bulman et al, 2017;Denizer et al, 2013;Feeny & Vuong, 2017), in particular as it sheds light on a country-level determinant which has been largely left out of existing studies. In so doing, Figure 1 highlights the importance of using indicators that correspond with the research question, especially for complex topics like corruption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Each project is rated on a six-point scale, which goes from 'Highly Satisfactory' to 'Highly Unsatisfactory'. Following Bulman et al (2017), Feeny and Vuong (2017), and Assefa et al (2014), all ratings are recoded into a binary format based on the underlying World Bank classification into satisfactory (ratings 1 to 3) and unsatisfactory projects (ratings 4 to 6). 4…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unnecessary delays usually experienced during development approval processes, continuity in financing of projects whenever there is a change of government might have responsible for this impact. Assefa et al (2013) investigated the development effectiveness of the African Development Bank Group-financed projects using 229 concluded projects between 2004 and 2012 to assess the major determinants of project performance. The study affirmed that country policies and institutions and country capacity in general is positively correlated with project performance whilst parallel project implementation units were not correlated.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Project performance has been modified to include completion within allocated period, within the budgeted cost, at the proper performance or specification level (Jin & Ling, 2019). According to Assefa, Rivera and Vencatachellum (2021) the performance enhancing factors once identified are useful diagnostic tools to correct deviations by building in warning systems and assist in improving the project performance and delivery. Therefore, the overall measurement of whether a project has met objectives and requirements of scope, cost, and schedule determines project performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%