2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) promotes cell survival by activation of the Akt pathway and role for CSN5/JAB1 in the control of autocrine MIF activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
288
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(320 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
16
288
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we investigated whether sCD74/MIF exhibited a different activation profile of classical MIF‐dependent kinases compared with MIF‐mediated activation of membrane CD74. As expected from previous work,56 we observed early as well as sustained protein kinase B (AKT) activation following MIF stimulation (0.5 hours: P <0.001, d =8.31; 10 hours: P =0.0485, d =1.18). This effect was significantly reduced in the presence of sCD74 (Figure 4A through 4D; whole blots of phosphorylated AKT, total AKT and tubulin are shown in Figure S9 and S10), suggesting that sCD74 inhibits MIF‐mediated AKT signaling (rMIF versus sCD74/rMIF, 0.5 hours: 198.7±8.40% versus 136.2±24.86%; P =0.0197, d =2.23; 10 hours: 157.5±30.91% versus 76.92±19.4; P =0.0422, d =1.32).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, we investigated whether sCD74/MIF exhibited a different activation profile of classical MIF‐dependent kinases compared with MIF‐mediated activation of membrane CD74. As expected from previous work,56 we observed early as well as sustained protein kinase B (AKT) activation following MIF stimulation (0.5 hours: P <0.001, d =8.31; 10 hours: P =0.0485, d =1.18). This effect was significantly reduced in the presence of sCD74 (Figure 4A through 4D; whole blots of phosphorylated AKT, total AKT and tubulin are shown in Figure S9 and S10), suggesting that sCD74 inhibits MIF‐mediated AKT signaling (rMIF versus sCD74/rMIF, 0.5 hours: 198.7±8.40% versus 136.2±24.86%; P =0.0197, d =2.23; 10 hours: 157.5±30.91% versus 76.92±19.4; P =0.0422, d =1.32).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Migration under such conditions was not only significantly decreased compared to the ''2 h'' treatment (P < 0.005), but there was also a tendency, which however did not reach statistical significance, that permanent exposure to rMIF led to a slight inhibitory effect compared to migration in the absence of rMIF. This could indicate that a baseline migration response is mediated by a low-efficiency constitutive-like release of MIF from the wtMEFs, consistent with earlier reports on autocrine effects of MIF [27][28][29].…”
Section: Short-term Treatment With Mif Promotes the Migration Ofsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…2). HuMIF binding of CD74 is also known to activate Akt (43), which can then result in BAD phosphorylation leading to activation of antiapoptotic pathways (44).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%