2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2023.229855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetotelluric constraints on the tectonic evolution beneath the Luotian dome in the North Dabie complex zone, Central China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 77 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted a dimensionality analysis based on phase tensors (Figure S4 in Supporting Information ), and the results indicate that for most of the stations, especially in the low‐frequency range (>100 s), the skew angles are less than 5°, which suggest that performing a two‐dimensional (2D) inversion is appropriate (Caldwell et al., 2004). Previous studies propose that TM mode data tend to offer greater reliability for 2D interpretation in the context of 3D effects (Ledo et al., 2002; Wannamaker et al., 1984; Yang et al., 2023). The 2D electrical resistivity model (Figure 2d) presented herein is obtained through inversion of TM mode data using the non‐linear conjugate gradient method (Newman & Alumbaugh, 2000).…”
Section: Data and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a dimensionality analysis based on phase tensors (Figure S4 in Supporting Information ), and the results indicate that for most of the stations, especially in the low‐frequency range (>100 s), the skew angles are less than 5°, which suggest that performing a two‐dimensional (2D) inversion is appropriate (Caldwell et al., 2004). Previous studies propose that TM mode data tend to offer greater reliability for 2D interpretation in the context of 3D effects (Ledo et al., 2002; Wannamaker et al., 1984; Yang et al., 2023). The 2D electrical resistivity model (Figure 2d) presented herein is obtained through inversion of TM mode data using the non‐linear conjugate gradient method (Newman & Alumbaugh, 2000).…”
Section: Data and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%