2014
DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2014.934772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mainstreaming adaptation in India – the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act and climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…O'Brien noted the various interpretations of transformation, with some regarding transformation as potentially dangerous, whereas others have considered it an opportunity for innovation. Although several articles noted the potential for alternate development pathways to increase poverty, inequality and/or vulnerability (e.g., Ref ), many SA articles in this review generally had a positive view of transformation and considered it a necessary step to address adaptation needs, arguing that change within existing development paradigms has been unlikely to result in adaptation that is sustainable. Accordingly, without transformation, the SA approach argues that adaptation responses would be limited to incremental adjustments that work within the existing system and fail to adequately respond to climatic and nonclimatic stressors.…”
Section: Approaches To Planned Adaptation In Developing Countriesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…O'Brien noted the various interpretations of transformation, with some regarding transformation as potentially dangerous, whereas others have considered it an opportunity for innovation. Although several articles noted the potential for alternate development pathways to increase poverty, inequality and/or vulnerability (e.g., Ref ), many SA articles in this review generally had a positive view of transformation and considered it a necessary step to address adaptation needs, arguing that change within existing development paradigms has been unlikely to result in adaptation that is sustainable. Accordingly, without transformation, the SA approach argues that adaptation responses would be limited to incremental adjustments that work within the existing system and fail to adequately respond to climatic and nonclimatic stressors.…”
Section: Approaches To Planned Adaptation In Developing Countriesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All articles identified in this review encouraged the integration of adaptation and development, with several arguing that donor stipulations have forced adaptation to be separated from development, despite the difficulty of distinguishing between adaptation and development in practice (e.g., Refs , , and ). Progress in fully merging adaptation and development was reportedly limited since the experience of practitioners has not been reaching policy‐makers, donors, and/or researchers . However, articles also noted that the complete integration of adaptation and development could lead to maladaptation depending on the consideration of long‐term climate consequences (e.g., Ref ), the extent or nature of climate change mitigation actions (e.g., Ref ), and the sustainability of the development paradigm with which adaptation has been integrated (e.g., Ref ).…”
Section: Differentiating Between Adaptation and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Irrigation, flood control and weather‐proof infrastructure. As Adam () has pointed out, these assets have the potential to increase communities’ resilience to climate‐related shocks.…”
Section: Mgnrega and Asset Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrigation, flood control and weather-proof infrastructure. As Adam (2015) has pointed out, these assets have the potential to increase communities' resilience to climate-related shocks. The MGNREGA has procedures to ensure that assets, such as water tanks or check dams, are built to a standard set of specifications; as we have outlined in 2.3, such procedures are essential if PWP assets are to be beneficial to communities in terms of increasing their climate resilience.…”
Section: Regulatory Framework For Resilient Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%