2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maize Response at Three Levels of Shade and its Improvement with Intensive Agro Forestry Regimes in Gunung Kidul, Java, Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find yield differences between the treatments, specifically; maize yield significantly different for all the treatments for the two seasons, while soybean yields not significantly different for mature Shea and young Shea treatments. We attribute this yield differences between the treatments to a number of factors; firstly, the response of maize and soybeans to different levels of shading as reported by [13]. The difference between maize and soybean yield can also be attributed to the physiological differences between the two crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We find yield differences between the treatments, specifically; maize yield significantly different for all the treatments for the two seasons, while soybean yields not significantly different for mature Shea and young Shea treatments. We attribute this yield differences between the treatments to a number of factors; firstly, the response of maize and soybeans to different levels of shading as reported by [13]. The difference between maize and soybean yield can also be attributed to the physiological differences between the two crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Studies have shown that shading stress reduces chlorophyll content, the photosynthetic rate (Pn) of the flag leaf, and C fixation (Mu et al, 2010), thereby reducing the assimilate supply to sink organs (Suryanto et al, 2014) and altering dry matter accumulation and partitioning patterns (Wang et al, 2003). Overall, shading stress eventually limits sink strength, leading to yield loss.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other empirical studies conducted in the Middle Hill regions of Nepal reported reduction in maize and millet production by the tree shade (Amatya et al 2018;Tiwari et al 2012). Such adverse shading effects, especially from trees with dense canopy, have also been confirmed in countries other than Nepal (Tiwari et al 2012) as well as on a variety of crops such as rice panicles and spikelets, maize, wheat, and legumes (Jose et al 2008;Lin et al 1998;Miyagawa et al 2017;Sharif et al 2010;Suryanto et al 2014). In this study, farmers acknowledged that the lack of proper forest management activities (e.g., thinning and pruning) contributed to the increased phenomenon of tree shading and incidences of crop raiding.…”
Section: A Cropland Abandonment Reported Reasonsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, we also included the shading effect (binary variable: parcel with or without shading effects) on cropland abandonment. Recent empirical studies have found that the shading effect of forests on the adjacent agriculture land (Miyagawa et al 2017;Sharif et al 2010;Suryanto et al 2014) occurs up to 15 m from the forest edge for wheat and rice and 30 m for maize (Schmidt et al 2019). Parcels close to forests could be less productive due to shading (Jose et al 2008) and crop raiding by wild animals living there (L. .…”
Section: Selection and Definition Of The Model Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%