Making it better together: a framework for improving creative engagement tools

Galabo, Rosendy; Cruickshank, Leon

doi:10.1080/15710882.2021.1912777

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Through this activity, they highlighted that it is important to consider whether the aim is to evaluate the product created and/or the quality of the co-creative processes, because these should be considered as two separate aspects of the evaluative options. Additionally, evaluation of the use of tools for creative engagement is useful (Galabo and Cruickshank, 2021).…”

Section: Solution Formulation To Arising Barriers Of Co-creation In P...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-creation solutions and the three Co’s framework for applying Co-creation

Pearce,

Magee

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeA sense of collective free-thinking with tangible goals makes co-creation an enlightening experience. Yet despite the freedom and organic flow of the methodology, there remain barriers to deploying co-creation in the real-world context. The aim was to understand the barriers and solutions to co-creation, reflect on applying co-creation in practice and co-create an applicable framework for co-creation.Design/methodology/approachThese reflections and conceptual developments were completed using a Participatory Action Research Approach through the co-creation of the Erasmus+ funded Co-creating Welfare course.FindingsResults presented are centric to the experiences in the United Kingdom but led to application at an international level. Problem formulation led to solutions devised about who should co-create, what co-creation aims to achieve, how to receive management buy-in, co-creating beyond the local face to face context and evaluation.Originality/valueThe Three Co’s Framework is proposed using the outline of: Co-Define, Co-Design and Co-Refine. Those who take part in co-creation processes are recommended to be called co-creators, with less focus on “empowerment” and more about facilitating people to harness the power they already have. Utilising online and hybrid delivery methods can be more inclusive, especially in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of co-creation needs to be evaluated more moving forwards, as well as the output co-created.

show abstract

Section: Solution Formulation To Arising Barriers Of Co-creation In P...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-creation solutions and the three Co’s framework for applying Co-creation

Pearce,

Magee

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, normalizing technology communication in cultural collaboration through an open innovation culture would be very sufficient for companies [24]. Appropriation often occurs when there is no existing tool for a task [25,26]. Thus, having a set strategy for an open innovation culture or system can help decrease its negative impacts [27].…”

Section: How Not To Appropriate Culture In Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategy for Cultural Inclusion in New Product Development Processes: A New Zealand Study

Mathrani

Ibrahim

2022

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cultural inclusion generates a positive impact by socially increasing pride for individuals or economically increasing a country’s global capital. Currently, in New Zealand (NZ), not many strategies exist that ensure inclusion of culture in new products introduced locally and globally. Further, cultural inclusion in products appears highly represented in the tourist markets, but not so much in the domestic markets. This paper examines the current NZ strategies for cultural inclusion in product development of different sized companies that supply locally and globally through three case studies and compares the findings with theoretical models used in other regions. Findings elaborate that NZ lacks in documented standardized strategies when it comes to cultural inclusion. A positive impact of having such a strategy is perceived by participating companies with a culture for open innovation to ensure they are following a process approach that can help include cultural aspects appropriately. Creating a unique position for the brand globally, increasing global capital and deeper connectivity, and increasing the understanding of culture were some key benefits identified. However, a few steps in the new product development process were found largely lacking in NZ firms, such as communication with cultural representatives and leaders. A cultural inclusion model is developed based on the study findings to include an open innovation culture that can help NZ companies be more inclusive in their design and establish a unique NZ market for generating positive impacts.

show abstract

A Framework for Infrastructuring Commons Creation

Sacks¹,

Galabo²

2022

[ ] With Design: Reinventing Design Modes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Making it better together: a framework for improving creative engagement tools

Cited by 10 publications

References 29 publications

Co-creation solutions and the three Co’s framework for applying Co-creation

Co-creation solutions and the three Co’s framework for applying Co-creation

Strategy for Cultural Inclusion in New Product Development Processes: A New Zealand Study

A Framework for Infrastructuring Commons Creation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About