2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammography as a Screening Tool for Coronary Artery Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
16
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
16
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Advancing age (OR 1.1), hypertension (OR 10) and positive CAD on angiography (OR 10.8) was found significantly associated with 12 761 women over the age 40 who attended multiphasic health check ups that included mammography (8). IMAC prevalence was low (3%) compared with other studies (2,6,10,21). This could be explained by low prevalence of CAD and its risk factors among the study population which consisted of generally healthy check up patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Advancing age (OR 1.1), hypertension (OR 10) and positive CAD on angiography (OR 10.8) was found significantly associated with 12 761 women over the age 40 who attended multiphasic health check ups that included mammography (8). IMAC prevalence was low (3%) compared with other studies (2,6,10,21). This could be explained by low prevalence of CAD and its risk factors among the study population which consisted of generally healthy check up patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Coronary artery disease (CAD) and cancer are the leading causes of female mortality and morbidity, especially in western countries (1,2). Breast cancer is among the most common deaths caused by cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,14 Obstructive CAD was generally defined as ≥50% coronary artery stenosis, except by Sarrafzadegann et al, 16 who used ≥50% stenosis in left main coronary artery and/or ≥75% stenosis in other epicardial arteries as the definition of obstructive CAD. There was 1 prospective cohort study, 7 2 retrospective cohort studies, 8,9 9 case-control studies with CAD, 1018 1 case-control study with BAC, 19 and 7 cross-sectional (prevalence) studies. 2025 Table 1 and Figures 2–4 show crude and adjusted ORs calculated from data extracted from each study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2; Table 1). One case-control study 17 used angiographically documented CAD (obstructive plus nonobstructive) or history of at least one episode of acute myocardial infarction as the definition of the case, and another study 18 used only angiographically documented CAD (obstructive plus nonobstructive) as the definition of case. Both studies showed a statistically significant relation between BAC and CAD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More significantly, women with CAD had a considerably higher incidence of BAC compared with age-matched women with no known CAD (P < 0.0001) The odds ratio of having CAD when BAC was present compared with having CAC when BAC is not present was 6.2% (95% confidence interval 4.3-8.8). This study indicates mammography may be a useful screening tool to identify women at risk for CAD [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%