2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.660800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management and Prognosis of Interstitial Lung Disease With Lung Cancer (ILD-LC): A Real-World Cohort From Three Medical Centers in China

Abstract: Background and ObjectiveInterstitial lung disease with lung cancer (ILD-LC) is rare and its management has not been fully described. This study aimed to investigate the management and prognosis of ILD-LC patients in China.MethodsThe present analysis is a retrospective real-world cohort study. Clinical data of ILD-LC patients were obtained from 3 hospitals in China. The overall survival (OS) of patients was analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.ResultsOne hundred eighty-four I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the 5-year OS was also poor at 40.7%. This is thought to be owing to the high risk of recurrence in ILD-LC [5,[13][14], di culty in therapeutic intervention upon recurrence [15][16], metachronous lung cancer [16], and the harmful complications resulting from treatment. However, for the ILD-LC patients treated with radiation, the mortality and ILD-speci c toxicity (de ned as grade-3 radiation pneumonitis or acute exacerbation of ILD) were 15.6% and 25%, respectively [17], with grade-5 radiation pneumonitis occurring in 2.7-16.7% [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, the 5-year OS was also poor at 40.7%. This is thought to be owing to the high risk of recurrence in ILD-LC [5,[13][14], di culty in therapeutic intervention upon recurrence [15][16], metachronous lung cancer [16], and the harmful complications resulting from treatment. However, for the ILD-LC patients treated with radiation, the mortality and ILD-speci c toxicity (de ned as grade-3 radiation pneumonitis or acute exacerbation of ILD) were 15.6% and 25%, respectively [17], with grade-5 radiation pneumonitis occurring in 2.7-16.7% [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the complex interplay of the aforementioned factors, the prognosis for ILD-LC is poor. Surgery is the standard treatment because the survival rate of surgery is higher than that of other treatments for early-stage lung cancer with ILD [5], but unfortunately, some patients died owing to AE caused by surgery or respiratory failure attributed to the progression of ILD [4]. When we selected surgery for ILD-LC, it was always di cult to manage the perioperative period without complications and to judge whether patients with decreased respiratory function could tolerate it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatal cases mainly involved respiratory failure and interstitial lung disease probably due to the progression of neoplasm and IV staging. A meta-analysis pointed out that patients affected by NSCLC and treated with EGFR-TKIs had a rare incidence of fatal toxic effects although the respiratory system was the most frequently involved ( 59 ). Interstitial lung disease is considered to be the most serious and fatal TKI-related ADR because the inhibition of EGFR signaling may damage the repair capability of lung cells and worsen pulmonary injury resulting in death ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition is also reportedly associated with a high risk of lung cancer; the incidence of lung cancer among patients with IPF is approximately 22.9 per 10,000 person-years 6 . Furthermore, patients with both lung cancer and IPF have poor prognosis and difficulty in proper management due to surgical morbidity and respiratory complication such as drug induced pneumonitis and acute exacerbation of IPF 7 , 8 . Patients with IPF regularly undergo chest CT for evaluation of disease progression and for the risk of developing lung cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%