1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7355-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Agricultural Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These can be captured in a simplified way by a decision tree model, which sets out, in chronological order, alternative courses of action (decision choices) and chance events with the time scale running from left to right (Dalton, 1982;Hardaker et al, 1997). This method has been used previously in the study of animal health problems (Marsh, 1999) and forms one example of a class of methodologies known as decision analysis, critically reviewed in this context by Ngategize et al (1986).…”
Section: Decision Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be captured in a simplified way by a decision tree model, which sets out, in chronological order, alternative courses of action (decision choices) and chance events with the time scale running from left to right (Dalton, 1982;Hardaker et al, 1997). This method has been used previously in the study of animal health problems (Marsh, 1999) and forms one example of a class of methodologies known as decision analysis, critically reviewed in this context by Ngategize et al (1986).…”
Section: Decision Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Useimmat oppikirjojen tarjoamat määritelmät liikkeenjohdosta (esim. Bradford ja Johnson 1953, Dalton 1982, Harsh ym. 1981, Castle ym.…”
Section: Johdantounclassified
“…It is important to define the area of responsibility of each FSG, to separate the components of such systems into endogenous and exogenous elements and to classify them into homogeneous types (Dalton, 1982). It is therefore necessary for MCRI to select a limited set of farming systems on which to work, by using the objectives and operating strategies of the institution.…”
Section: The Model Of the Farming Systems Research Group (Fsg) Collabmentioning
confidence: 99%