Managing P2P services via the IMS

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONThe benefits of peer-to-peer (P2P) systems as vehicles for information dissemination and virtual collaboration are overwhelming. They beat the conventional client-server (C-S) approach in terms of scalability, availability, and network efficiency, to mention a few benefits (see slide 2). Nevertheless, from the management point of view, existing P2P systems are not commercially viable. Key problems are:Operator bypass and legality. P2P services can be easily offered by third-party providers beyond the network operator's ability to control them (simple examples are Skype [1] (offering P2P communication services) and BitTorrent [2] (offering P2P file sharing services). Operator bypass poses problems in terms of management of resources. It is very hard (if not impossible) to monitor and control the traffic incurred by a P2P system, which leads to resource saturation and poor performance (in fact many network providers and campus networks rate limit or even block P2P traffic). The other problem is that the openness and lack of control of existing P2P systems leads more and more often to copyright infringement and lawsuits [3] -i.e., current P2P systems are not suited to distributing copyrighted digital material.Business models and charging. Charging schemes conventionally used in the Telco domain are based on well-known revenue sharing models, interconnection principles and charging mechanisms. These cannot be easily ported onto current P2P systems which bypass the operator (bullet 1) and are self-managed. An effective model based on incentives is adopted in our work.Interoperability. Current P2P systems are mainly proprietary and do not interoperate with each other. Initiatives for standardizing P2P platforms have so far not lead to any definite solution. Lack of interoperability defies the very purpose of P2Pi.e. having a system where any terminal can share resourcesand considerably limits their ubiquity. Our P2P-IMS prototype indicates a possible way forward, since the IMS is already the service provisioning platform of choice.Mobile friendliness. Current P2P systems are heavyweight and not suited to thin mobile terminals. This is a considerable limitation given the commercial trends and developments in the area of mobile networks. Our prototype works on mobile UMTS terminals, bringing the power of P2P to the mobile user.Working with a major network operator, we have developed a new approach to managed, operator-mediated P2P service provisioning. Our prototype is built as a new service component of the IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) [5], the standardized service provisioning platform of choice of the operators. Here we illustrate the benefits of this approach which brings the advantages of existing P2P systems into the realms of the operator, the service provider, and the digital media production and distribution companies. Our prototype can also be seen as a way to demonstrate how the IMS can be P2P-enabled. The current IMS is based on a C-S architecture and is therefore it not geared for the deployment...

Challenges to Next Generation Services in IP Multimedia Subsystem

“…To provide IMS P2P service, Liotta et al introduce a novel P2P service, the PeerMob system [10]. The peerMob system is realized as a SIP-based application, making the P2P service IMScompatible without changing any existing IMS servers.…”

“…And they also assume that content in [10] has been categorized well using meta-information according to a semantic-based mechanism which was proposed in [11]. The PeerMob system has three main functions:…”

IP MULTIMEDIA SUBSYSTEM - The Operator's Response to P2P Service Demand

“…Peer components were tested on the IPAQ 5550 with IBM J9 virtual machine. Further implementation details, including the software architecture, system components, sequence diagrams, and case studies are described in [7].…”

BoxLock: Mobile-based Serpent cryptographic algorithm and One-Time Password mechanism implementation for Dropbox files security

“…THE FRAMEWORK DESIGN OF IMS OVERLAY NETWORK Recently, there are three main types of researching on the IMS and P2P fusion: 1) Using IMS solves the problem of P2P network. Through the IMS control and management mechanism, the P2P cyber source and flow management can be optimized [1]; 2) IMS P2P signaling process: using P2P technology optimizes the IMS session of including signaling interaction, improves IMS core network reliability and session processing capacity [2], [3]; 3 ) IMS P2P media transmission: the P2P technology be used to optimize the media transmission process in a IMS session [4], [5].…”