Managing prosthetic complication in implant-retained overdenture

Dhillon, Navneet K.; Chowdhury, S.K. Roy; Kumar, Prashant; Menon, Rahul P.

doi:10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.11.014

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The other 79 dentists were not approached for the following reasons: personal or professional affiliations with the interviewer, 12 inability to retrieve the e-mail address, 13 not practicing in the Netherlands, or inclusion of a dentist practicing in the nearby area. 14 After this recruitment round, five dentists agreed to participate. Three implantologists reported not being able to participate in the study due to lack of time, while the remaining 161 did not provide a reason for non-participation.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Clinical cases of protecting an implant-supported RP with metal parts from fractures have been published. 14 , 29 In a 5-year prospective case series study, Boven et al 30 found acceptable/good outcomes in terms of implant survival, peri-implant bone level, probing depths, and peri-implant plaque, calculus, and bleeding indices for maxillary implant-supported overdentures opposed by (partial) natural dentitions, with the overdentures fabricated in a similar way as the implantologist described above. 30 The authors also report good patient satisfaction at the end of the follow-up period.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Experience with bruxism in the everyday oral implantology practice in the Netherlands: a qualitative study

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo explore how bruxism is dealt with by accredited oral implantologists within daily clinical practice.Materials and methodsNine semi-structured interviews of oral implantologists practicing in non-academic clinical practices in the Netherlands were performed, and thematic analysis was conducted using a framework-based approach.ResultsOral implant treatments in bruxing patients were a generally well-accepted practice. Complications were often expected, with most being of minor impact. Contradictive attitudes emerged on the topic of bruxism being an etiologic factor for peri-implant bone loss and loss of osseointegration. Views on the ideal treatment plan varied, though the importance of the superstructure’s occlusion and articulation features was repeatedly pointed at. Similarly, views on protective splints varied, regarding their necessity and material choice. Bruxism was diagnosed mainly by clinical examination, alongside with patient anamnesis and clinician’s intuition. There was little attention for awake bruxism.DiscussionBruxism was generally not considered a contraindication for implantological treatments by accredited oral implantologists. Views on the interaction between bruxism and bone loss/loss of osseointegration varied, as did views on the ideal treatment plan.ConclusionsThere is a need for better understanding of the extent to which, and under which circumstances, sleep and/or awake bruxism can be seen as causal factors for the occurrence of oral implant complications.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experience with bruxism in the everyday oral implantology practice in the Netherlands: a qualitative study

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, at the end of the 24th month, the loss rates were 26.09% for females and 30.77% for males (Table-2). One of the compl cat ons that we encounter over t me n mplant-supported prostheses s fractures n base of prosthes s. In 2015, dh llon et al, 12 prevented the fracture of the prosthes s base by support ng w th cast chrome-cobalt metal substructure to prevent base fractures. In our study, the base fracture n the mand ble locator holders was more at the end of the 24th month.…”

Section: Materi̇als and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of complications in implant-supported locator retained removable dentures: 24 Months Retrospective Study

Fadhıl

Mumcu

2020

Journal of Biotechnology and Strategic Health Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim e purpose is to evaluate the complications that occur in implanted locator supported removable dentures for 2 years clinically and radiologically. Materials and methods Study between the years of 2014-2019, was performed on 121 patients who underwent 284 dental implants and came to their controls at the 12th and 24th months. Patients included in the retrospective study were 52 men and 69 women. Complications detected in the rst 24 months a er the implant supported prosthesis applied; relining and rebasing, loss of retention (housing removal, wear of the retaining clip) and fracture in the base of prosthesis were recorded and evaluated. Data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD tests. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically signi cant. Results In implant-supported removable prostheses, there are signi cant di erences were found between the increasing complication rates at 12th and 24th months (p <0.05). e most common complication at the end of 24th month in overdenture prosthesis with implant supported locator holder applied to the maxilla and mandible, respectively; relining of prosthesis (11.57%), rebasing of prosthesis (6.6%), loss of retention (5.79%) and prosthetic base fracture (4.13%). Conclusion Based on the data analyzed in our study, removable prostheses showed di erent types and frequency of complications. Treatment of implantsupported overdenture prostheses, routine control of the prostheses is important. Keywords Dental Implant, Overdenture, Locator, Prosthet c Compl cat on Öz Amaç Bu çalışmanın amacı, mplant üstü locator destekl hareketl protezlerde meydana gelen kompl kasyonları 2 yıl boyunca kl n k ve radyoloj k olarak değerlend rmekt r.

show abstract

Съемные Конструкции С Опорой На Дентальные Имплантаты

Рубникович¹,

Мулик²

2020

№1 (2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Цель исследования. Провести аналитический обзор литературы, посвященной съемному протезированию с опорой на дентальные имплантаты. Материалы и методы. Для анализа были отобраны научные статьи по теме использования съемных протезов с опорой на дентальные имплантаты за период 20002019 гг. Поиск источников выполнялся с помощью библиографических баз данных PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Республиканской научной медицинской библиотеки, поисковой системы Google. Результаты и обсуждение. Нами был проведен систематический обзор литературы, посвященной съемному протезированию с опорой на дентальные имплантаты, в частности проанализированы источники, касающиеся проблематики количества и расположения имплантатов, использования протокола немедленной нагрузки в сравнении с классическим подходом, различных вариантов армирования съемных протезов с опорой на дентальные имплантаты, рассмотрены статьи об осложнениях при данном виде протезирования. Заключение. Протезирование пациентов с полной вторичной адентией съемными протезами с опорой на дентальные имплантаты требует систематического контроля за состоянием пациента со стороны врача после сдачи ортопедической конструкции и может быть сопряжено с различными осложнениями. Многочисленные проблемы протезирования полного дефекта зубного ряда съемными протезами с опорой на дентальные имплантаты, такие как несоответствие базиса протезному ложу, вследствие неизбежного прогрессирования атрофических явлений со стороны тканей беззубой челюсти до сих пор не были разрешены и требуют дальнейшего изучения. The aim of the study is to conduct the analysis of the literature, dedicated to prosthetic treatment with the usage of implant-supported overdentures. Object and methods of the research. Scientific articles from 2000 to 2019 dedicated to overdenture restoration supported by dental implants were selected for the analysis. The search of the sources was conducted with the help of bibliographic databases PubMed, Medline, Scopus, State Scientific Medical Library, Google search. Results and discussion. The systematic overview of the literature dedicated to overdenture restoration supported by dental implants was conducted. Particularly, the sources connected with the problematics of the quantity and location of dental implants, the problematics of the immediate loading protocol in comparison with the conventional approach, the problematics of overdenture restoration supported by dental implants reinforcement and complications, connected with this type of treatment, were studied. Conclusion. The treatment of edentulous patients with the usage of overdenture restoration supported by dental implants demands the systematic control of patients condition by the doctor after the prosthetics delivery and can be followed by various complications. Different problems of the edentulous jaw rehabilitation with the usage of overdenture restoration supported by dental implants, like base mismatch to the denture-bearing tissues due to the inevitable progression of atrophic phenomena are still unresolved and need further research.

show abstract

Managing prosthetic complication in implant-retained overdenture

Cited by 4 publications

References 7 publications

Experience with bruxism in the everyday oral implantology practice in the Netherlands: a qualitative study

Experience with bruxism in the everyday oral implantology practice in the Netherlands: a qualitative study

Evaluation of complications in implant-supported locator retained removable dentures: 24 Months Retrospective Study

Съемные Конструкции С Опорой На Дентальные Имплантаты

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About