2020
DOI: 10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_172_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandibular ramus and gonial angle—Identification tool in age estimation and sex determination: A digital panoramic radiographic study in north indian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This helps in the automation technique using any programming environment. Bali Behl et al [ 24 ] proposed a method based on panoramic evaluation for mandible morphometric changes in postpubertal and prepubertal in the Turkish population. The authors measured bicondylar breadth (BB), gonial angle measurement, antegonial angle (AGA), ramus height, and ramus breadth (RHRB), which were captured from the Turkish population.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This helps in the automation technique using any programming environment. Bali Behl et al [ 24 ] proposed a method based on panoramic evaluation for mandible morphometric changes in postpubertal and prepubertal in the Turkish population. The authors measured bicondylar breadth (BB), gonial angle measurement, antegonial angle (AGA), ramus height, and ramus breadth (RHRB), which were captured from the Turkish population.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to increased rate of resorption in the older age group. But there are few studies by Taleb et al-2015 and Behl et al 2020, which contradicts this observation [26,27]. This difference could be due to geographical variations of sampling, non-random sampling and variations in sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Also, many studies have been carried out in India on gender determination using mandibular ramus but most of them had a sample size of less than 100 OPGs. [6,12] Therefore the current study was planned using a sample size of 600, and it produced reliable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%