Mandibulotomy Technique and Permanent Molar Injury After Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in Infants

Abstract

Objective: The risk that mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) poses to the developing mandibular dentition is well-known; however, less is understood about how the choice of instrumentation used for mandibular osteotomy might affect the development of permanent molars. Methods: Retrospective chart review examining infants with micrognathia who underwent MDO from 2010 to 2018 at a single tertiary care children’s hospital using external, multivector devices. The first and second permanent mandibular molars were radiographically examined years after surgery to determine whether osteotomy cutting techniques affect the risk of injury to the permanent dentition. Results: Thirty-seven infants and children underwent MDO from 2010 to 2018. Follow-up dental radiographs were available for 17 patients; 6 patients were excluded based on the use of preoperative computed tomography, utilization of virtual surgical planning technology, use of buried internal distractors, or older age at the time of distraction surgery. This yielded a total of 11 patients who underwent MDO with external hardware without virtual surgical planning representing 22 osteotomies. Sixteen osteotomies were performed using a side-cutting burr and 6 with a piezoelectric saw. The median age at distraction surgery was 3 weeks. The rate of an abnormal permanent first or second mandibular molar finding per osteotomy was 88% (14/16) in the side-cutting group versus 17% (1/6) with the piezoelectric technique (P = 0.004). Conclusion: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis risks injury to the mandibular molars; however, this study suggests a significant risk reduction in molar injury if the piezoelectric device is utilized.