2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009gc002864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of seismic layer 2A/2B boundary above the sheeted dike unit at intermediate spreading crust exposed near the Blanco Transform

Abstract: [1] We present results from a study mapping the seismic layer 2A/2B boundary in young ocean crust located adjacent to the north wall of the Blanco Transform Fault (BTF). We review seafloor features, geochemical and petrologic data, seismic imaging, and seismic structure and conclude that the BTF seismic study region is representative of crust formed at the intermediate spreading Juan de Fuca Ridge. The mean layer 2A two-way travel time beneath the seafloor is 0.37 ± 0.10 s for the 42 × 12 km seismic survey are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Spreading rate has been proposed as a predictor of crustal morphology (Morgan & Chen, ), but global studies have not shown a relationship between spreading rate and crustal thickness, except possibly at ultraslow spreading rates (Brown & White, ; Chen, ). We find no correlation when comparing the thickness of layer 2A to spreading rate across the transect (Figure ); this interpretation matches a similar comparison of published layer 2A thickness values (Christeson et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spreading rate has been proposed as a predictor of crustal morphology (Morgan & Chen, ), but global studies have not shown a relationship between spreading rate and crustal thickness, except possibly at ultraslow spreading rates (Brown & White, ; Chen, ). We find no correlation when comparing the thickness of layer 2A to spreading rate across the transect (Figure ); this interpretation matches a similar comparison of published layer 2A thickness values (Christeson et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Table is a comparison of one standard deviation of layer 2A thicknesses from our overall mean in the South Atlantic with thickness ranges reported by previous studies at slow and intermediate spreading ridge systems (Arnulf et al, ; Arnulf et al, ; Baran et al, ; Blacic et al, ; Christeson et al, ; Hussenoeder et al, ; Nedimović et al, ). While our range is larger than those of other studies, we suggest that this is an expected result given our larger age range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, as shown in Figure 1 of Christeson et al (2010), the lavas are thicker than layer 2A at all of these sites except Hess Deep and Pito Deep. However, as shown in Figure 1 of Christeson et al (2010), the lavas are thicker than layer 2A at all of these sites except Hess Deep and Pito Deep.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The layer 2/3 boundary shown in black is taken from the Collins et al (1995) seismic profile. Also shown are profiles from Grevemeyer et al (1998) and Christeson et al (2010), which do not exhibit features that might correspond to layer 2C. Also shown are profiles from Grevemeyer et al (1998) and Christeson et al (2010), which do not exhibit features that might correspond to layer 2C.…”
Section: Defining Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation