2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping radiation damage zoning in zircon using Raman spectroscopy: Implications for zircon chronology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This loss of damage with temperature and time is a problem for the interpretation of zircon Raman dates as crystallization ages (Nasdala et al, 2001(Nasdala et al, , 2002 but unlocks the potential for determining cooling ages and analyzing the thermal histories of natural zircon samples (Resentini et al, 2020). Annealing of radiation damage also affects He diffusion and is thus a process that needs to be taken into account in the interpretation of (U-Th) / He dates of zircon (Ginster et al, 2019;Anderson et al, 2020). Since the Raman analysis of zircon is non-destructive, there is a high potential for including zircon Raman dating into a multi-method geochronological workflow on zircon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This loss of damage with temperature and time is a problem for the interpretation of zircon Raman dates as crystallization ages (Nasdala et al, 2001(Nasdala et al, , 2002 but unlocks the potential for determining cooling ages and analyzing the thermal histories of natural zircon samples (Resentini et al, 2020). Annealing of radiation damage also affects He diffusion and is thus a process that needs to be taken into account in the interpretation of (U-Th) / He dates of zircon (Ginster et al, 2019;Anderson et al, 2020). Since the Raman analysis of zircon is non-destructive, there is a high potential for including zircon Raman dating into a multi-method geochronological workflow on zircon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drop in He retention at high α-doses is corroborated by mapping He concentrations in zoned zircons showing high variation of eU across zones (Danišik et al, 2017). Recent studies on zircon (U-Th)/He dating (Anderson et al, 2020;Hueck et al, 2018) use Raman measurements for monitoring radiation damage for improving the interpretation of (U-Th)/He ages. Ginster (2018) reported that radiation-damage annealing also changes He diffusion parameters compared unannealed zircons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Measurements of self-irradiation damage are thus an important part of thermochronologic studies. Such measurements broke ground for: (a) zircon Raman dating, in which the self-irradiation damage itself is a measure of the age of the sample (Härtel, Jonckheere, Wauschkuhn, Hofmann, et al, 2021;Pidgeon, 2014); (b) the refinement of thermochronometers, whose results are influenced by self-irradiation damage, for example, (U-Th)/ He dating (Anderson et al, 2020;Guenthner et al, 2013); and (c) the applicability of provenance studies, using Raman characteristics of detrital zircons to distinguish thermal histories (Garver & Davidson, 2015;Resentini et al, 2020).Zircon (ZrSiO 4 ) substitutes U and Th for Zr in its structure. Disintegration of 238 U, 235 U, 232 Th, and their daughters damages the lattice by the emission of α-particles and the recoil of the daughter nuclei (Bohr, 1948;Joly, 1907;Mügge, 1922).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pb, Hf and O diffusion rates in crystalline zircon were shown to be sluggish under anhydrous conditions [16][17][18][19][20] , whereas O diffuses faster under hydrous conditions 16,21 . In addition, the resetting of U-Pb ages is also controlled by the degree of radiation damage of the zircon lattice 10,22 , which variably resets U-Pb ages when zircon recrystallization without uids 5,13,14 . In contrast, during dissolution-reprecipitation and recrystallization in the presence of metamorphic uids, both U-Pb ages and O isotope system in zircon would be partially or completely reset 13,14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%