2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping recent sea ice conditions in the Barents Sea using the proxy biomarker IP25: implications for palaeo sea ice reconstructions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
69
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
8
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher MOC content in the MIZ and ice-covered region (Fig. 5) may be a result of a combination of higher production and the addition of ice algae and TOM and thus more efficient export [39,40,66]. These results confirm that the export ratio is higher (34 %) in the ArW region due to a shorter productive season than in the AW sector [46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The higher MOC content in the MIZ and ice-covered region (Fig. 5) may be a result of a combination of higher production and the addition of ice algae and TOM and thus more efficient export [39,40,66]. These results confirm that the export ratio is higher (34 %) in the ArW region due to a shorter productive season than in the AW sector [46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Monthly mean ice edge positions for the years 1750-2002 were compared and the maximum southernmost extent determined. The location of the maximum southernmost ice extent constructed in this way corresponds closely to the maximum sea ice extent in Navarro- Rodriguez et al (2013) based on NSID and Met Office Hadley Centre ice charts.…”
Section: Study Regionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although beyond the scope of the current investigation, there remain other factors that still need addressing before the palaeoclimatic interpretations of IP 25 presence and abundance can be fully understood (Belt and Müller, 2013). Continuing the analytical theme, one such factor includes appropriate calibration of IP 25 concentrations with known sea ice conditions using the approaches of Müller et al (2011), Navarro-Rodriguez et al (2013 and Stoynova et al (2013). Of particular importance, in this respect, will be the establishment of threshold levels of sedimentary IP 25 , below which, sea ice reconstruction is considered unreliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We believe that all of these demand serious attention, especially as sea ice reconstruction studies carried out thus far have depended critically, not only on the variable abundance of IP 25 (see Belt and Müller, 2013 for a review) but also on its presence/absence (e.g. Axford et al, 2011;Belt and Müller, 2013;Cabedo-Sanz et al, 2013;Méheust et al, 2013;Navarro-Rodriguez et al, 2013;Stoynova et al, 2013). As a further recommendation from this study, therefore, we propose that laboratories not only measure, but report, certain aspects pertaining to figures of merit for their analytical procedure, including assessments of precision (e.g.…”
Section: Key Outcomes and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%