2019
DOI: 10.1504/ijwbc.2019.098696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the agenda-setting theory, priming and the spiral of silence in Twitter accounts of political parties

Abstract: This paper presents the results of a content analysis of the official Twitter accounts of the main Spanish political parties (Partido Popular, Partido Socialista Obrero Español, Podemos, Ciudadanos and Izquierda Unidad) carried out for the period of the 2015 Spanish general election. Compositional biplots are used for data visualization. Unlike traditional approaches, compositional analysis in general, and the biplot in particular, emphasize the relative salience of issues within the agenda. This analysis shed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study borrowed heavily from the agenda-setting theory, put forth by McCombs and Shaw in 1972, which posits that members of the audience not only learn about public issues through mass media, but also attach meaning to such issues depending on the emphasis placed to it by the media (Blasco-Duatis, et al, 2019). Thus, the media influences the importance of topics on the public by attaching prominence and frequency to the coverage of issues.…”
Section: Theoretical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study borrowed heavily from the agenda-setting theory, put forth by McCombs and Shaw in 1972, which posits that members of the audience not only learn about public issues through mass media, but also attach meaning to such issues depending on the emphasis placed to it by the media (Blasco-Duatis, et al, 2019). Thus, the media influences the importance of topics on the public by attaching prominence and frequency to the coverage of issues.…”
Section: Theoretical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%