2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.80.054417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the magnetic anisotropy in (Ga,Mn)As nanostructures

Abstract: Anisotropic strain relaxation in ͑Ga,Mn͒As nanostructures was studied combining time-resolved Kerr microscopy and ferromagnetic resonance techniques. Local resonance measurements on individual narrow stripes patterned along various crystallographic directions reveal that the easy axis of the magnetization can be forced perpendicular to the strain relaxation direction. Spatially resolved measurements on disk-shaped and rectangular ͑Ga,Mn͒As structures allow us to directly visualize these local changes in the ma… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b ). Whereas, as for small damping and if the magnetization M being parallel to the externally applied magnetic field, a non-zero phase shift would be expected and the line shape of FMR spectrum does not exclusively correspond to imaginary magnetic susceptibility, as follows from LLG equation, but represents a mixture of imaginary and the real part of the susceptibility 41 . Given the asymmetric nature of the real part of the dynamic susceptibility as inferred from LLG, we conclude that the asymmetric profile at moderate electric fields in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b ). Whereas, as for small damping and if the magnetization M being parallel to the externally applied magnetic field, a non-zero phase shift would be expected and the line shape of FMR spectrum does not exclusively correspond to imaginary magnetic susceptibility, as follows from LLG equation, but represents a mixture of imaginary and the real part of the susceptibility 41 . Given the asymmetric nature of the real part of the dynamic susceptibility as inferred from LLG, we conclude that the asymmetric profile at moderate electric fields in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 To compute the exchange field, we used literature data for (Ga,Mn)As, in terms of the spin stiffness A = 4 × 10 −8 erg/cm, 29 the uniaxial anisotropy constant K U = −1.1 × 10 3 erg/cm 3 , and the cubic anisotropy constant K C = 2.2 × 10 3 erg/cm 3 . 31 Because of the strong cubic anisotropy we can consider K eff ≈ K C /4. 29 The (Ga,Mn)As saturation magnetization was determined by SQUID to be M = 38 G (at T = 12.5 K) for 12% Mn and 18 G (at T = 10 K) for 6% Mn (both 30 nm thickness).…”
Section: B Magnetometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Note that the associated switching fields cannot directly be compared as coercive fields of extended films (for SQUID) and of micropatterned contact strips (for spin injection) are different [25,26]. To determine T C with SQUID magnetometry, we measured the T dependence of the magnetic moment mðTÞ at 10 mT, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Prl 107 056601 (2011) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Ementioning
confidence: 99%