Mapping the technology footprint in design for social innovation

Chuan, Li; Guillem, Bacete

doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2022.07.003

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The technology is currently associated with digital technology. The use of technology, especially digital technology, which is widely spread, may construct digitalization as a form or part of SI (Enciso-Santocildes et al, 2021 ; Fahmi & Arifianto, 2021 ; C. Li & Bacete, 2022 ; Sari et al, 2020 ), which can enable changes in the community.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, research in these areas is rarely found. Currently available research focuses on entrepreneurship and leadership (Grilo & Moreira, 2022 ; Rana et al, 2022 ; Vaccaro & Ramus, 2022 ), transition, transformation, and impact within society (Avelino et al, 2019 ; Dall-Orsoletta et al, 2022 ; Kim et al, 2021 ; Ruthemeier et al, 2022 ), inter-organizational collaborations and value creation (Ozdemir & Gupta, 2021 ), business model, strategy, and governance (de Souza João-Roland & Granados, 2023 ; Dionisio & de Vargas, 2020 ; Gasparin et al, 2021 ; Ney, 2014 ; Peris-Ortiz et al, 2018 ), the role of technology (Boussafi et al, 2021 ; Conti & Orcioni, 2022 ; Enciso-Santocildes et al, 2021 ; C. Li & Bacete, 2022 ; Peterlin et al, 2021 ), and literature or conceptual framework regarding the concept (Ahmadi et al, 2022 ; Cajaiba-Santana, 2014 ; Daniel & Jenner, 2022 ; Fursov & Linton, 2022 ; Kim et al, 2021 ; Nicholls & Dees, 2015 ; Osburg & Schmidpeter, 2013 ; Rao-Nicholson et al, 2017 ; Solis-Navarrete et al, 2021 ; van der Have & Rubalcaba, 2016 ). In Indonesia, research on SI is still rarely found, and this term remains less popular than TI.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Diffusion of Social Innovation: the Innovation Provider’s Perspective

Prihadyanti

Aziz²,

Sari³

2023

J Knowl Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social innovation (SI) is a potential solution to various problems and challenges in the agriculture sector. Agri-tech start-ups can be considered important agents for developing SI in the sector. In Indonesia, agri-tech start-ups are also expected to develop SI for sustainable agricultural development in the medium-term national development plan 2020–2024. Using multiple case studies, this paper attempts to complement the currently available literature and deepen the knowledge regarding the differences between SI and traditional innovation. This research also discusses the role of business organizations, represented by agri-tech start-ups, in developing SI, by observing the diffusion model and innovation-decision process. This research identifies characteristics of SI theoretically complemented with empirical description. Three models of diffusion leading to different types of innovation-decision processes and communication channels are identified. Several internal and external factors are influencing the diffusion process. In the process, the start-ups also hold bridging roles that vary according to company characteristics. Practical implications regarding successful SI development are provided.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%