Market strategy options to implement Thailand demand response program policy

Sonsaard, Parinya; Ketjoy, Nipon; Mensin, Yodthong

doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113388

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Projects in the Netherlands, Germany, and Australia are aggregating behind meter batteries to provide grid services. In Thailand, the aggregator model for utility companies was studied by Parinya et al [22], in which on-demand response (DR) and analyses using Thailand's power market under the Enhanced Single Buyer (ESB) concept were focused on. Peer-to-peer: Prosumers and consumers can trade electricity, without an intermediary, at an agreed price.…”

Section: Typology Of the Energy Business Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Business Perspectives of Distributed System Operators for Solar Rooftop-as-a-Service

Leewiraphan,

Ketjoy,

Thanarak

2023

Energies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rising fossil energy prices and the significantly decreasing prices of energy technology have resulted in electricity consumers having the option to install solar PV rooftops to rely on the self-consumption of clean energy. However, the increase in this amount is affecting the revenue of electricity as a utility, which must adapt and develop its business model to accommodate the situation. If the utility cannot be adapted in time, it may lead to a loss of income from services and the sale of electricity from fossil energy. The utility in Thailand’s electricity market that acts as the distribution system operator (DSO) is known as the Provincial Electricity Authority (PEA), and the Metropolitan Electricity Authority (MEA) is responsible for managing distribution networks and customers. There are four types of solar rooftop-as-a-service (RaaS) business perspectives they could consider as opportunities through which to minimize revenue impact. The business services were designed for the DSO customer as follows: Consulting, Design, and Installation (CDI); Operation and Maintenance (O&M); Energy Service Company (ESCO); and Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). The model comprises four customer segments: residential buildings and small-, medium-, and large-scale commercial buildings. This paper applies SWOT, Five Forces, 4P marketing, and economic impact analyses to identify the possibilities when using the DSO business model. The SWOT analysis demonstrates that ESCO and PPA are strengths in the DSO’s performance characteristics and existing customer data. In the electricity industry, both models offer enormous customer bargaining power in terms of a Five Forces analysis. The main reason is that there is currently high competition in the installation service. In the 4P analysis result, the price per unit is found to be significantly lower than in residential scenarios. Therefore, there is a format for presenting promotions with an advantage over competitors. Deploying an after-sales service that brings convenience to all customer segments is needed. The economic analysis conducted using Cournot competition game theory shows a significant differential in the Medium (M) and Large (L) customer sectors’ competition due to lower technology prices. In conclusion, with the current regulatory framework and criteria, the ESCO and PPA show the best practical model from a utility business perspective. The recommendation for DSO is to create a strategic ecosystem and to link it with private companies as their partnership business.

show abstract

Section: Typology Of the Energy Business Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%