2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Martensite-enabled magnetic flexibility: The effects of post-growth treatments in magnetic-shape-memory Heusler thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atomic and magnetic force microscopy (Veeco Dimension 3100, CA, USA) imaging (supplementary material Figure S1) confirmed the X-type microstructure for the as-grown samples [26]. For sample #1, Y-type configuration stripes were induced by mechanical stress [7]. The details of X-and Y-microstructures are reported in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Atomic and magnetic force microscopy (Veeco Dimension 3100, CA, USA) imaging (supplementary material Figure S1) confirmed the X-type microstructure for the as-grown samples [26]. For sample #1, Y-type configuration stripes were induced by mechanical stress [7]. The details of X-and Y-microstructures are reported in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The first sample (#1) was grown directly on (100) MgO followed by post-annealing (3600 s at 623 K in 10 −3 mPa) and local mechanical stress (normal to the substrate, straining the film along the edge of MgO). The applied stress value was estimated to be >20 MPa, as described in [7], where complementary and detailed results on this sample can be found. The second sample (#2) was grown on 50 nm Cr underlayer, and in turn grown on the (100) MgO substrate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations