2013
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MASSIV: Mass Assembly Survey with SINFONI in VVDS

Abstract: Context. The contribution of the merging process to the early phase of galaxy assembly at z > 1 and, in particular, to the build-up of the red sequence, still needs to be accurately assessed. Aims. We aim to measure the major merger rate of star-forming galaxies at 0.9 < z < 1.8, using close pairs identified from integral field spectroscopy (IFS). Methods. We use the velocity field maps obtained with SINFONI/VLT on the MASSIV sample, selected from the star-forming population in the VVDS. We identify physical p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
72
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(130 reference statements)
12
72
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The close pair studies mentioned above suggest the merger fraction is closer to 4% at z ß0.6 (e.g. see Figure 24 of López-Sanjuan et al 2013) and if the timescales are similar then these should be comparable and clearly they are not. Puech et al argued that a fraction of their objects were in what they called a 'postfusion' phase, these should be compared to close pairs at an earlier epoch (z ß1.1) which lessens the tension due to the fast evolution in pairs with redshift.…”
Section: The Merger Ratementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The close pair studies mentioned above suggest the merger fraction is closer to 4% at z ß0.6 (e.g. see Figure 24 of López-Sanjuan et al 2013) and if the timescales are similar then these should be comparable and clearly they are not. Puech et al argued that a fraction of their objects were in what they called a 'postfusion' phase, these should be compared to close pairs at an earlier epoch (z ß1.1) which lessens the tension due to the fast evolution in pairs with redshift.…”
Section: The Merger Ratementioning
confidence: 89%
“…One approach to measuring merger rates more precisely is to take a close pair catalogue and confirm the kinematic association spectroscopically using slit spectroscopy (Chou et al 2012). An interesting hybrid approach was used by López-Sanjuan et al (2013), where they took advantage of the fact that their IFS maps were wider field than typical to count close kinematic pairs (within ß20 kpc and 500 km s −1 ) as Kinematics of High-z Star-Forming Galaxies 37 well as advanced ongoing mergers for star-forming galaxies with 10 10−10.5 M ࣻ . Good agreement was found by López-Sanjuan et al between their kinematic and other's photometric surveys at 1 < z < 1.5.…”
Section: The Merger Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the velocity separation between the two components in such a pair is 500  km s −1 (see the discussion by Lin et al 2004;Lotz et al 2008), numerical simulations suggest that such systems should predominantly trace major galaxy-galaxy mergers during their first pericentric passage and before final coalescence (Lotz et al 2008(Lotz et al , 2010. Indeed, when merger rates derived from such close pairs (e.g., Bundy et al 2009;de Ravel et al 2009;Williams et al 2011;López-Sanjuan et al 2013;Tasca et al 2014) are combined with physically motivated timescales for interaction, the overall agreement on merger rates between different studies is relatively good (Lotz et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At redshifts beyond z ∼ 1, only a few direct identifications of pairs and measurements of the merger fraction and merger rate exist. López-Sanjuan et al (2013) report a high pair fraction of ∼20−22% at 1 < z < 1.8 from 3D spectroscopy measurements in MASSIV (Mass Assembly Survey with Sinfoni in VVDS, Contini et al 2012). At higher, redshifts Conselice et al (2003) has used the CAS (concentration, asymmetry clumpiness) methodology, which relies on image shapes and the expected signature of on-going or past mergers, to perform a measurement of the merger fraction up to z ∼ 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%