Mat-O-Covid : comment l’utiliser ?

Badreau, Marie; Sembajwe, Grace; Descatha, Alexis; Fadel, Marc; Pitet, S.; Gilbert, F.; Valter, R.; Leclerc, Annette; Verdun-Esquer, Catherine; Esquirol, Yolande; Legeay, Clément; Petit, A.; Dinh, Aurélien; Andujar, Pascal; Leclerc, Jean-Pierre; Letheux, Corinne; Duprat, P.; Clodore, B.; Cartégnie, S.; Dagrenat, C.; Dab, William; Clin-Godard, B.; Gehanno, J.-F.; Dubée, Vincent; Havette, P.

doi:10.1016/j.admp.2022.01.011

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As we focused our attention on review papers alone, we may have missed new or emerging issues that have not yet been targeted by reviews of the literature. It is probable that some relevant studies on very specific aspects of biological hazards have been missed due to their novelty: for instance, as we mentioned earlier, healthcare workers' fitness to work [ 8 ], states of the arts without reviews [ 90 ] or with no relationship with health issues [ 91 ], the proportion of workers exposed to COVID-19 and job-exposure matrices [ 9 , 10 ], exposure to antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, exposure to some biological risks and effects on mental health [ 11 ], and reviews or guidelines on general preventive, health, and safety issues that included biological hazards were not included in this overview [ 12 ]. We also focused only on publications in English and French, but we found articles concerning a great diversity of countries and covering a long period.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematized Overview of Published Reviews on Biological Hazards, Occupational Health, and Safety

Descatha,

Hamzaoui,

Takala

et al. 2023

Safety and Health at Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematized Overview of Published Reviews on Biological Hazards, Occupational Health, and Safety

Descatha,

Hamzaoui,

Takala

et al. 2023

Safety and Health at Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In a British study, it has been shown that workers who were in close contact daily with others had a higher prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, as compared to homeworkers (8). Several jobexposure matrices (JEM) have been developed to assess workplace factors that are associated with exposure to SARS-CoV-2 (9)(10)(11).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Occupational risks associated with severe COVID-19 disease and SARS-CoV-2 infection – a Swedish national case-control study conducted from October 2020 to December 2021

Bergström¹,

Murgia²,

Alderling³

et al. 2023

Scand J Work Environ Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether workplace factors and occupations are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19 in the later waves of the pandemic. METHODS: We studied 552 562 cases with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 in the Swedish registry of communicable diseases, and 5985 cases with severe COVID-19 based on hospital admissions from October 2020 to December 2021. Four population controls were assigned the index dates of their corresponding cases. We linked job histories to job-exposure matrices to assess the odds for different transmission dimensions and different occupations. We used adjusted conditional logistic analyses to estimate odds ratios (OR) for severe COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The highest OR for severe COVID-19 were for: regular contact with infected patients, (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.23–1.54), close physical proximity (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.34–1.61), and high exposure to diseases or infections (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.52–1.96). Mostly working outside had lower OR (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57–1.06). The odds for SARS-CoV-2 when mostly working outside were similar (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.80–0.86). The occupation with the highest OR for severe COVID-19 (compared with low-exposure occupations) was certified specialist physician (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31–3.21) among women and bus and tram drivers (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.49–2.79) among men. CONCLUSIONS: Contact with infected patients, close proximity and crowded workplaces increase the risks for severe COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Outdoor work is associated with decreased odds for SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19.

show abstract

Mat-O-Covid : comment l’utiliser ?

Cited by 2 publications

References 6 publications

A Systematized Overview of Published Reviews on Biological Hazards, Occupational Health, and Safety

A Systematized Overview of Published Reviews on Biological Hazards, Occupational Health, and Safety

Occupational risks associated with severe COVID-19 disease and SARS-CoV-2 infection – a Swedish national case-control study conducted from October 2020 to December 2021

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About