2015
DOI: 10.1080/17533015.2015.1088557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material interaction and art product in art therapy assessment in adult mental health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variation is associated with making choices, play, experimentation and exploration of the art materials. This relates to what in the literature is referred to as ‘material interaction’ (Pénzes et al, 2014, 2015). Material interaction refers to the clients’ dialog with art materials’ properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Variation is associated with making choices, play, experimentation and exploration of the art materials. This relates to what in the literature is referred to as ‘material interaction’ (Pénzes et al, 2014, 2015). Material interaction refers to the clients’ dialog with art materials’ properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is this relation between formal elements and the making process that could explain why they provide information about clinically significant emotional and behavioral concerns of clients (Hinz, 2009; Conrad et al, 2011). In previous studies this was specified by the concept of material interaction (Pénzes et al, 2014, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Observing patients' material interactionthe way they interact with art materialsmay enable art therapists to gain insight into their amount of rationalisation, flexibility and motivation. Furthermore, based on an analysis of the formal elements of patients' art products, Pénzes, van Hooren, Dokter, Smeijsters, and Hutschemaekers (2016) concluded that impartial art therapist judges were able to accurately describe patients' material interaction and related psychological characteristics. The accuracy of their descriptions was determined by comparing judges' and treating art therapists' case descriptions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%