2018
DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/97826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical and Statistical Bibliometric Indicators for Scholars in the Field of Romance Languages and Linguistics

Abstract: The rapid development of using information technology enables scholars to present their work in the worldwide databases, to read works of other colleagues, to be read, to get citations. The primary objective of this study is to show the scholars of Romance languages and linguistics who meet with their projects and publications in Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie (AUF) how to work with databases. The second objective is to point out that to present research made in the field of Romance languages and ling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The total amount of works considered was 37, and the descriptors applied TPACK and TPCK, of which a high percentage of the publications in indexed scientific journals, in both databases, were reiterated. The study was designed following the structure and recommendations of other systematic reviews [22][23][24][25] regarding databases, searching strategies, limits, and filtered documents presented in Table 1. 2018 AND (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, "ar")) AND (LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, "SOCI") OR LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, "COMP") OR LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, "MATH")) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, "English") OR LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, "Spanish")) AND (LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, "TPACK"))…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total amount of works considered was 37, and the descriptors applied TPACK and TPCK, of which a high percentage of the publications in indexed scientific journals, in both databases, were reiterated. The study was designed following the structure and recommendations of other systematic reviews [22][23][24][25] regarding databases, searching strategies, limits, and filtered documents presented in Table 1. 2018 AND (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, "ar")) AND (LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, "SOCI") OR LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, "COMP") OR LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, "MATH")) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, "English") OR LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, "Spanish")) AND (LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, "TPACK"))…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter "leadership competence" is low and has a small range of deviations. According to G. Rinne (Bírová et al, 2018), such values of indicators are caused by the fact that employees have not worked out ways to show initiative, which significantly complicates the implementation of communication management. The indicator of motivation has high level, but of all parameters it demonstrates the largest range of deviations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To concretize the LPT structure, we conducted the correlation analysis of the parameters selected through variance analysis with LPT expert assessment. It allowed us to define the structure of LPT, its structural components and diagnostic methods (Ponomarenko, 2017;Gorev et al, 2018;Bírová et al, 2018):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%