2022
DOI: 10.1103/prxquantum.3.010324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix-Model Simulations Using Quantum Computing, Deep Learning, and Lattice Monte Carlo

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both models can be defined with local Hamiltonians described in details by Ref. [9] and the sought-after physical states are those invariant under SU(2) gauge transformations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both models can be defined with local Hamiltonians described in details by Ref. [9] and the sought-after physical states are those invariant under SU(2) gauge transformations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our benchmark focuses on the expectation value of relevant operators (energy, gauge Casimir) for various strengths of the gauge coupling λ = g 2 N = 2g 2 . For these SU(2) gauge models, where the number of degrees of freedom is limited, we can compare directly with results from exact diagonalization of a truncated Hamiltonian (using the Fock basis) in the limit where the truncation effects are negligible [9]. Moreover, for the supersymmetric model we know that the energy of the ground state is exactly zero at each coupling due to supersymmetry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can can take an approach of thermodynamics using Hamiltonian quantum cosmology [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] or the thermodynamics of Matrix models [61]. In either case quantum computing should be a useful tool to examine the states and thermodynamic observables [62] [63] [64] [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By dimensionally reducing supersymmetric theories all the way down to (0+1)-dimensional quantum mechanics, we end up with significantly simpler systems to analyze. In addition to reducing the number of degrees of freedom, which makes these theories promising targets for near-term quantum simulation [2][3][4][5], the dimensionally reduced systems also tend to be super-renormalizable. In many cases a one-loop counterterm calculation suffices to restore supersymmetry in the continuum limit [6], with no need for the numerical fine-tuning typically required in higher dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%