Maturity Model for Production Management

Kosieradzka, Anna

doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.109

Cited by 30 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It worked on the premise that organisations could progress through the five levels and strive towards "perfection" at level "certainty". Recent similar maturity models include maintenance management maturity model (Antil, 1991;Fernandez et al, 2003;Oliveira, 2012), the energy management maturity model (Introna et al, 2014), the portfolio management maturity model (Nikkhou et al, 2016), and the maturity model for production management (Kosieradzka, 2017).…”

Section: Maturity Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disaster prevention through a harmonized framework for high reliability organisations

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increasing havoc wrecked by catastrophic incidents on organisations worldwide, as well as the increasing devastating effects of these incidents, has necessitated the development of a framework to improve the reliability of organisations. Despite operating in tightly coupled and complex technologies, high reliability organisations (HROs) continue to operate mindfully with minimal incidents. Given that most disasters have occurred in organisations and industries not considered as truly HROs, this paper argues that applying organisational learning from HROs across diverse organisations in different industries could potentially reduce organisational disasters. This paper recognised the numerous researches in HRO theory, but noticed the unavailability of a harmonized measurable framework that could be standardized and applied across diverse organisations. Using the HRO principles, this paper conducted a research in 8 organisations, in 3 industries across 2 continents. It developed the organisational reliability maturity model (ORM 2 ) to track the progression organisations through 5 maturity levels. It developed the framework for organisational reliability maturity (FORM) to measure maturity levels of organisations, predict potentials for disasters, benchmark, and improvement organisations. It is hoped that this paper will deepen existing research in disaster prevention and HRO theory, while opening up new areas of knowledge.

show abstract

Section: Maturity Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disaster prevention through a harmonized framework for high reliability organisations

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The maturity model is a framework of tools and practices, enabling a comprehensive assessment of the organization's key competencies in managing and improving crucial factors leading to the established goals (Kosieradzka, 2017).…”

Section: Maturity Models Contextualizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying an Adaptation of the Prado Project Management Maturity Model in an Academic Context

Araújo

Ribeiro

2021

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A comprehensive overview of 24 maturity grids built on the ideas of Crosby’s quality grid is presented by Maier et al (2012). In the last years, several other models have been proposed in literature to assess the maturity of: Lean management (Urban, 2015); demand-driven supply chain (Mendes et al , 2016); risk management (Oliva, 2016); portfolio management (Nikkhou et al , 2016); energy management (Finnerty et al , 2017); sustainability (Meza-Ruiz et al , 2017; Machado et al , 2017); production management (Kosieradzka, 2017).…”

Section: Literature Review: Maturity Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation and improvement of maintenance management performance using a maturity model

Oliveira

Lopes

2019

IJPPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a new maturity model to identify the current state of maintenance area of organizations and drives actions to increase efficiency and effectiveness toward the concept known as world-class.Design/methodology/approachThe model was developed based on an extensive literature review on maintenance management and maturity assessment, which allowed identifying the relevant factors in maintenance management and the world-class behaviors for each factor. The progressive maturity levels for each of the identified ten factors form the model. To test its effectiveness, it was applied to the maintenance area of three companies.FindingsThe model application showed that, in addition to being a self-assessment tool, it provides knowledge, to those who use it, on behaviors or practices that enable world-class results. For each factor, potential gaps and the desired state were defined focusing on behaviors rather than on indicators values or adopted methodologies, which facilitates the identification of improvement actions that lead to better performance.Research limitations/implicationsThrough its use, maturity levels can be identified for all considered maintenance management factors, however, the overall maturity of the maintenance area is not determined. Although this overall evaluation can be done assigning a weight to each factor, it was not considered an added value for the set purpose.Originality/valueThe proposed maturity model contributes to the understanding of the maintenance management process and how to stand out nowadays in an area that has an increasingly important impact on productivity and quality.

show abstract

Maturity Model for Production Management

Cited by 30 publications

References 4 publications

Disaster prevention through a harmonized framework for high reliability organisations

Disaster prevention through a harmonized framework for high reliability organisations

Applying an Adaptation of the Prado Project Management Maturity Model in an Academic Context

Evaluation and improvement of maintenance management performance using a maturity model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About