Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation and Simultaneous Implant Placement Using Locally Harvested Autogenous Bone Chips and Bone Debris: A Prospective Clinical Study

Johansson, Lars-Åke; Isaksson, Sten; Lindh, Christina; Becktor, Jonas P.; Sennerby, Lars

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.093

Cited by 54 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The implants were installed at the same surgical step of the bone graft procedure, with a minimal limit of 4mm of alveolar bone height 10,11,20,24 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Virtual planning and construction of prototyped surgical guide in implant surgery with maxillary sinus bone graft

Martins

Lederman

2013

Acta Cir. Bras.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of associating techniques of bone grafting in the maxillary sinus with the use of a prototyped surgical guide for planning and positioning dental implants in total edentulous maxillae, rehabilitated after six months. METHODS:Eight patients consecutives with totally edentulous maxilla presenting few remaining bone in the posterior alveolar ridge, associated with pneumatization of the maxillary sinus were selected. Twenty eight Brånemark RP 10mm implants were installed in 14 maxillary sinuses. The surgical planning for the implant installation was performed with the DentalSlice software by means of a computerized tomography. The obtained images were used for building a surgical guide that, placed over the maxilla, showed the exact position for the implants installation (prototyped surgical guide). The portion of the implants that went into the maxillary sinus was covered by an autogenous bone graft. RESULTS:The patients were re-evaluated six months after the surgery and a 100% success rate was achieved. All of the implants presented no mobility or symptoms, permitting an oral rehabilitation with total fixed screw-retained prosthesis over the implants. CONCLUSION:The technique of associating implants and bone graft in the maxillary sinus aided by a prototyped guide planned on DentalSlice has showed itself efficient for positioning implants and for quantifying and locating the bone graft.

show abstract

“…The implants were installed at the same surgical step of the bone graft procedure, with a minimal limit of 4mm of alveolar bone height 10,11,20,24 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Virtual planning and construction of prototyped surgical guide in implant surgery with maxillary sinus bone graft

Martins

Lederman

2013

Acta Cir. Bras.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Autogenous corticocancellous bone cores can be obtained intraorally or extraorally (Galindo-Moreno et al, 2007), however, this requires an additional second surgical donor site and additional morbidity (Park 2010). A bone trap may be used to harvest bone debris during implant preparation, with additional bone collected by further drilling adjacent to the implant sites or by using a bone scraper to harvest cortical bone chips from the zygomatic buttress and from the lateral sinus wall before opening a bony window (Johansson et al, 2010). By using this approach, the autogenous bone can be achieved adjacent to the surgical site without the need for a remote second surgical donor site and additional morbidity (Park 2010).…”

Section: Type Of Graft 21 Autogenous Graftmentioning

confidence: 99%

Various Ways to Enhance the Results of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedures

Park¹

2011

Implant Dentistry - The Most Promising Discipline of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Thus, procedures for bone augmentation are usually required through maxillary sinus lift surgeries [7][8][9] . In addition, bone reconstructions for vertical and horizontal bone gains are not uncommon in posterior maxilla 10 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone grafting for alveolar ridge reconstruction. Review of 166 cases.

Salmen

Oliveira

Gabrielli

et al. 2017

Rev. Col. Bras. Cir.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to investigate the predictive factors of failure in bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation and implant surgery. Methods: we reviewed the charts of 166 patients operated between 1995 and 2014. A total of 248 grafting procedures were performed. We submitted the data to the binomial test at 5% significance. Results: grafts to gain width of the alveolar ridge (65.32%) were more frequent than sinus lifting (p<0.0001) and the number of grafts to the posterior maxilla (48.8%) was greater than in other regions (p<0.01); 6.04% of the grafts were lost. The losses in anterior (p<0.0309) and posterior (p<0.0132) maxilla were higher than in the mandible. There were 269 implants installed in the grafted areas, of which only 4.83% were lost. The number of implants lost (4.51%) in areas of onlay grafts was not statistically higher than those placed after sinus lifting (2.63%, p<0.2424). Losses were greater in the anterior (53.85%) and posterior (38.46%) maxilla than in the mandible (p<0.031). Regarding patients' age, 76.92% of the lost grafts (p<0.006) and 80% of the lost implants (p<0.001) were installed in patients over 40 years. Conclusion: failure rate was higher both for grafts and dental implants in the maxilla and in patients over 40 years of age.

show abstract

Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation and Simultaneous Implant Placement Using Locally Harvested Autogenous Bone Chips and Bone Debris: A Prospective Clinical Study

Cited by 54 publications

References 26 publications

Virtual planning and construction of prototyped surgical guide in implant surgery with maxillary sinus bone graft

Virtual planning and construction of prototyped surgical guide in implant surgery with maxillary sinus bone graft

Various Ways to Enhance the Results of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedures

Bone grafting for alveolar ridge reconstruction. Review of 166 cases.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About