2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximizing your Patient Education Skills (MPES): A multi-site evaluation of an innovative patient education skills training course for oncology health care professionals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The first pile consisted of articles ( n = 25) whose findings did not have the potential to be relevant for communication training. The four main reasons for not considering these articles were as follows: they reported an element of communication, which is specific to a local context and thus not suitable for training outside this very context, for instance Egan et al (), Heidari and Mardani‐Hamooleh () and Anarado, Ezeome, Ofi, Nwaneri, and Ogbolu (); they assessed the effect of a communication tool, for instance Miller et al (), Lipson‐Smith et al () and Cooley et al (); they focused on a singular clinical situation (e.g., fertility preservation) or treatment (e.g., for early stage non‐small cell lung cancer, recurrent ovarian cancer), for instance Elit et al (), Dyer and Quinn (), and Golden, Thomas, Moghanaki, and Slatore (); or they addressed interventions to empower patients, for instance Jones et al (), and Halkett et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first pile consisted of articles ( n = 25) whose findings did not have the potential to be relevant for communication training. The four main reasons for not considering these articles were as follows: they reported an element of communication, which is specific to a local context and thus not suitable for training outside this very context, for instance Egan et al (), Heidari and Mardani‐Hamooleh () and Anarado, Ezeome, Ofi, Nwaneri, and Ogbolu (); they assessed the effect of a communication tool, for instance Miller et al (), Lipson‐Smith et al () and Cooley et al (); they focused on a singular clinical situation (e.g., fertility preservation) or treatment (e.g., for early stage non‐small cell lung cancer, recurrent ovarian cancer), for instance Elit et al (), Dyer and Quinn (), and Golden, Thomas, Moghanaki, and Slatore (); or they addressed interventions to empower patients, for instance Jones et al (), and Halkett et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An appropriate literature search was conducted to find a validated questionnaire in the PE field to be administered to the Scientific Board Directors. As no tools matched the purpose of the survey, the Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO) of Aviano, as leader of the project and in collaboration with project partners, developed, an hoc questionnaire on the basis of: a previous OECI-Organization of European Cancer Institutes [ 25 ] questionnaire addressed to survey the ongoing activities of PE in the European cancer organizations; the results of a survey customer satisfaction/information needs assessment regarding the educational activities organized at CRO [ 26 ] the collaboration with the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and its PE Programme [ 27 , 28 ] and a professional relationship with the Cancer Patient Education Network [ 29 ]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Én studie er en systematisk oversikt over kvalitative studier (29) og tre har en mixed method-design (15,30,36). To studier undersøker ved hjelp av kvantitative data hvilken innvirkning helsepedagogiske opplaeringstiltak har på tilegnelsen av kunnskaper, ferdigheter og holdninger til personer som planlegger å gi opplaering og laerings-og mestringstilbud (35,36). De 16 inkluderte studiene belyser altså kompetanse fra ulike synsvinkler.…”
Section: Hensikt Metodeunclassified
“…De 16 inkluderte studiene belyser altså kompetanse fra ulike synsvinkler. Ikke alle problemstillingene i studiene hadde kompetanse som tema, men tok opp spørsmålet i presentasjonen av studienes resultater Hele tolv av de 16 studiene understreker at det er viktig å kunne lede grupper av pasienter og brukere for å tilrettelegge for laering og mestring på en adekvat måte (15,22,24,25,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)36). Studiene beskriver i hovedsak to dimensjoner ved gruppeledelse.…”
Section: Hensikt Metodeunclassified