2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-015-9488-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum magnitude estimation considering the regional rupture character

Abstract: The main objective of the paper is to develop a new method to estimate the maximum magnitude (M max ) considering the regional rupture character. The proposed method has been explained in detail and examined for both intraplate and active regions. Seismotectonic data has been collected for both the regions, and seismic study area (SSA) map was generated for radii of 150, 300, and 500 km. The regional rupture character was established by considering percentage fault rupture (PFR), which is the ratio of subsurfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, two values of maximum magnitudes have been considered: the maximum historical magnitude ever recorded in the region and the previous value increased by 0.5 units. The maximum magnitude adopted in this study is in line with the NDMA (2010) and Anbazhagan et al (2015a) record for the Southern Craton.…”
Section: Recurrence Modelsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In the present study, two values of maximum magnitudes have been considered: the maximum historical magnitude ever recorded in the region and the previous value increased by 0.5 units. The maximum magnitude adopted in this study is in line with the NDMA (2010) and Anbazhagan et al (2015a) record for the Southern Craton.…”
Section: Recurrence Modelsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The maximum probable earthquake magnitude has been calculated using both deterministic and probabilistic approach. Kijko Method (Kijko and Sellevoll 1989) and regional rupture characteristics (Anbazhagan et al 2015b) have been used in calculation. For the estimation of using Kijko and Sellevoll (1989), calculation of is already discussed above.…”
Section: Maximum Magnitude Estimation ( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of completeness ( ) is also calculated by nine methods proposed by Woessner and Wiemer (2005). Maximum magnitude has been determined weighted mean using increment factor on maximum observed magnitude, Kijko and Sellevoll (1989) and regional rupture characteristics (Anbazhagan et al 2015b). Ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) has been selected from the twenty-seven numbers of applicable…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three methods, viz. conventional methods of increment of 0.5 in maximum observed magnitude (M max obs ) based on b values, the Kijko method (Kijko and Sellevoll, 1989), and regional rupture characteristics (Anbazhagan et al, 2015b), have been used in M max calculation. For the estimation of M max using Kijko and Sellevoll (1989), calculation of M c is already discussed above.…”
Section: Maximum Magnitude Estimation (M Max )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of completeness (M c ) is also calculated using nine methods proposed by Woessner and Wiemer (2005). Maximum magnitude has been determined using weighted mean considering three methods: increment factor on maximum observed magnitude, the method of Kijko and Sellevoll (1989), and regional rupture characteristics (Anbazhagan et al, 2015b). Ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) have been se-lected from the 28 numbers of applicable GMPEs for the region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%