2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum overpressure vs. H2 concentration non-monotonic behavior in vented deflagration. Experimental results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mass flow suddenly decreased at 295 ms, the combustion rate increased abruptly, and peak P ext was formed [27]. In Stage IV, the overpressure, combustion rate, and mass flow all fluctuate for a short time near the maximum value and then suddenly decrease, which is mainly attributed to the maximum flame area caused by the refrigerator [28]. As shown in Figure 8(b), the flame propagates toward the wall at a faster speed at 316 ms. At this time, the flame area reaches its maximum, thus forming the peak P mfa , until the flame area and mass flow begin to decrease, and the overpressure drops rapidly.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Overpressure Formation and Flamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mass flow suddenly decreased at 295 ms, the combustion rate increased abruptly, and peak P ext was formed [27]. In Stage IV, the overpressure, combustion rate, and mass flow all fluctuate for a short time near the maximum value and then suddenly decrease, which is mainly attributed to the maximum flame area caused by the refrigerator [28]. As shown in Figure 8(b), the flame propagates toward the wall at a faster speed at 316 ms. At this time, the flame area reaches its maximum, thus forming the peak P mfa , until the flame area and mass flow begin to decrease, and the overpressure drops rapidly.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Overpressure Formation and Flamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…proper formulation for accounting for obstacles. Both these models show a large scatter in predictions for realistic obstacle used in recent studies [24,25].…”
Section: Comparison Of New Model Predictions and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) Bauwens et al [4] (ii) Kumar [20] (iii) Daubech et al [21] (iv) Kumar [22] (v) Bauwens et al [23] (vi) Schiavetti and Carcassi [24] (vii) Skjold et al [25] (viii) Daubech et al [35] The experimental results are divided into various sets depending upon the complexity of the experiments and their applicability in real accidental scenarios. (ii) Kumar [20] (iii) Daubech et al [21] (iv) Daubech et al [35] Bauwens et al [4] carried out experiments in their 63.7 m 3 cuboidal enclosure and tested the variation of hydrogen concentrations, vent areas, and ignition locations.…”
Section: Model Predictions For Overpressurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations