2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.567863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MCIC: Automated Identification of Cellulases From Metagenomic Data and Characterization Based on Temperature and pH Dependence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in silico screening strategies for identifying novel enzymes are being used profitably, [31][32][33] automation of the selection of a limited number of promising hits for characterization is challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although in silico screening strategies for identifying novel enzymes are being used profitably, [31][32][33] automation of the selection of a limited number of promising hits for characterization is challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sequence-based analysis tools have been developed for the prediction of key protein characteristics, e.g., thermostability, 34 optimum pH 31 or protein solubility. [35][36][37][38] Other computational tools help to analyze, filter and visualize the large sets of identified hits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying both the free and immobilized enzyme during the degradation of the rice straw in saline conditions leads to an increase in the production of reducing sugars [171]. In the field of microbial enzymes identification, more sophisticated, machine-learning-based tools were also developed, but they have not gained much popularity in halophilic research yet [173][174][175]. Most likely, it is related to the simplicity and clarity of the standard analytical pipelines.…”
Section: In Silico Methods For Identification Of Novel Halophiles Bioproductsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited customization options MCIC [174] FINDER [175] Ribosomally produced AMP Classic alignment-based approach DRAMP [176] The user is not limited by a predefined set of databases and comparison parameters Very flexible Any combination of databases for analysis can be selected Requires a combination of tools for the best effect In some cases a choice of optimal pipeline can be challenging Cannot identify the AMP types that are not included in the database CAMPR [177] LAMP [179] APD [178] Automated pipelines…”
Section: Automated Pipelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From metagenome data, previous studies identified efficient high-potential glycoside hydrolases enzymes in lignocellulose-based industries ( Fatemeh et al, 2020 ; Maleki et al, 2020 ; Ariaeenejad et al, 2020b ; Motamedi et al, 2021a ; Ariaeenejad et al, 2021a ). Bioinformatics tools and computational methods are considered accessible and fast technological techniques for achieving new enzyme sequences ( Ariaeenejad et al, 2018 ; Foroozandeh Shahraki et al, 2020 , 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%