2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measles epidemiology and vaccination coverage in Oromia Region, Ethiopia: Evidence from surveillance, 2011–2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This age group generally corresponds to the period after weaning from breastfeeding when the child is no longer protected by maternal antibodies. The predominance of boys was found in the study by Yitbarek [11,12]. To date, there are no plausible scientific explanations for the male predominance of measles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This age group generally corresponds to the period after weaning from breastfeeding when the child is no longer protected by maternal antibodies. The predominance of boys was found in the study by Yitbarek [11,12]. To date, there are no plausible scientific explanations for the male predominance of measles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Based on the Ethiopian Mini Demographic and Health Survey (EMDHS) 2019 report, the coverage of MCV1 was 59%, and the lowest coverage was in the Afar Region (28.5%) [ 8 ]. There was a persistently high incidence of measles in the Oromia Region of Ethiopia between 2011 and 2018, where 25,000 measles cases were reported [ 9 ]. A study that used the EMDHS 2019 data showed that the MCV2 coverage was 12.36% [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In settings where there is low coverage of MCV1, implementing MCV2 routine or supplementary immunisation activities (SIAs) to increase the proportion of two-dose individuals may result in a smaller effect than reaching zero-dose MCV individuals [ 10 ]. Delayed 1st dose of MCV may also be incorrectly reported in administrative records as 2nd dose of MCV, leading to incorrect assumptions of overall population immunity [ 11 ]. Given VE, to effectively control outbreak risk, measles immunisation programmes aim to understand the relationship between zero-dose, MCV1, and MCV2 immunisation proportions in individuals [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%