2016 2nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icieam.2016.7911415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measure of reliability tools for simulating electric power systems and alternative approach of their verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hardware and software simulation tools appropriate for modeling failing with this problem in virtue of the limited mathematical calculations, and the impossibility of solving large systems of differential equations describing processes in EPS. Moreover, when solving the systems of differential equations by numerical methods, the computational error accumulates, which reduces the reliability of the simulation results [4][5][6]. Various scientific community and research laboratories when modeling large wind parks are necessity to apply certain limitations and assumptions, applying equivalent models in calculations.…”
Section: Wind Farm Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardware and software simulation tools appropriate for modeling failing with this problem in virtue of the limited mathematical calculations, and the impossibility of solving large systems of differential equations describing processes in EPS. Moreover, when solving the systems of differential equations by numerical methods, the computational error accumulates, which reduces the reliability of the simulation results [4][5][6]. Various scientific community and research laboratories when modeling large wind parks are necessity to apply certain limitations and assumptions, applying equivalent models in calculations.…”
Section: Wind Farm Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike standard methods, the method does not require integration, transformation of the original PF. Also, unlike modifications of the Monte Carlo method [1,7], the SIBD does not require an increase in the number of tests according to the number of random arguments to obtain a statistical representation of the result with the required accuracy [6,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%