2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.09.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the influence of titanium hip prosthesis on therapeutic electron beam dose distributions in a novel pelvic phantom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linear and mass attenuation coefficient of Nylon-12 were not done due to having access to a small piece (prostate piece). However, in the literature, a difference of 1.5 % was found between the mass attenuation coefficient of Nylon-12 (0.0458 cm 2 /g) and RW3 slabs (0.0465 cm 2 /g) [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The linear and mass attenuation coefficient of Nylon-12 were not done due to having access to a small piece (prostate piece). However, in the literature, a difference of 1.5 % was found between the mass attenuation coefficient of Nylon-12 (0.0458 cm 2 /g) and RW3 slabs (0.0465 cm 2 /g) [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Ade et al, [16] reported the RW3 slab linear attenuation coefficient of 0.0486 cm -1 and the mass attenuation of 0.0465 cm 2 /g measured for 6 MV photon beam. These materials (dental wax and superflab bolus) were chosen as they are regularly used in radiotherapy to compensate for missing tissue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enhancement in dose at tissue-metal interfaces due to electron contamination is known to be dependent on a number of factors such as thickness and width of interface, design and atomic composition of the interface, thickness of medium overlying the interface, field size as well as the differences in multiple scattering of secondary electrons and the incident beam energy (Figure 7) (Ade & Du Plessis, 2017;Chatzigiannis et al, 2011). Yet, in this study, bit depth is the only variation that seems to influence the dose distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ade and du Plessis ( 29 ) investigated the perturbation effect of a unilateral titanium prosthesis on the dose distribution of 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams. Using a built-in titanium hip prosthesis, it was observed that the proximal dose enhancement of the prosthesis ranged as 21-23%, and the distal dose reduction of the prosthesis was 18-21% with 6 MV photon beam irradiation.…”
Section: The Effect Of Different Kind Of Metal Implants On Dosagementioning
confidence: 99%