1968
DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(68)90069-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of the thicknesses of auroral structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
119
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
8
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Dense Array consists of three imagers with different narrow (compared to all-sky view) field-of-view optics. The main scientific motivation arises from an earlier study by Knudsen et al (2001) who used All-Sky Imager (ASI) combined with even earlier TV camera observations (Maggs and Davis, 1968) to suggest that there is a gap in the distribution of auroral arc widths at around 1 km. With DAISY observations we are able to show that the gap is an instrument artifact and due to limited spatial resolution and coverage of commonly used instrumentation, namely ASIs and TV cameras.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dense Array consists of three imagers with different narrow (compared to all-sky view) field-of-view optics. The main scientific motivation arises from an earlier study by Knudsen et al (2001) who used All-Sky Imager (ASI) combined with even earlier TV camera observations (Maggs and Davis, 1968) to suggest that there is a gap in the distribution of auroral arc widths at around 1 km. With DAISY observations we are able to show that the gap is an instrument artifact and due to limited spatial resolution and coverage of commonly used instrumentation, namely ASIs and TV cameras.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field-aligned beams with as many as five discrete beams have been observed, with each having a different velocity. An estimate of the distance traveled between consecutive FABs can be obtained by using information from 2-D distributions, sampled every 125 ms. Multiplying the spacecraft velocity of ∼4.7-4.9 km s −1 with the sampling time of 0.125 s shows that the spacecraft has traveled ∼ 590-610 m. This distance mapped to the ionosphere using the T96 model indicates that the footprint of Cluster has moved ∼ 295-305 m. This distance is very typical of the auroral arc dimensions measured by Maggs and Davis (1968). Thus, our suggestion is that the discrete beams measured by Cluster represent the separation distance between the equipotential contours in auroral arcs.…”
Section: E Lee Et Al: Relating Field-aligned Beams To Inverted-v Stmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, these dimensions are much larger than the dimensions of a typical aurora. Various forms of auroras optically determined from a ground-based orthicon television camera (Davis, 1966) showed that the auroral dimensions can be as small as ∼ 70 m, and most of the auroral structures have dimensions less than ∼ 1 km (Maggs and Davis, 1968). Observations by Maggs and Davis (1968) have also established that the dimensions of the aurora when not measured along the magnetic zenith direction are much larger than the actual dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current density is then 2.9 x 10 -4 amps/m 2 . This thickness is a normal one for auroral structures; for example Maggs and Davis (1968) found a median thickness of 230 meters for a set of 581 auroral structures. On the other hand, the calculated current intensity of 2.9 x 10 -4 amp/m 2 is higher than any previously reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%