Measurements of theg J -factors of12C in the3 P 1 and3 P 2 states

Abstract

The experimental results are in moderate agreement with theoretical calculations.

Sub 20 cm−1 computational prediction of the CH bond energy – a case of systematic error in computational thermochemistry

“…Namely, the spin–orbit (SO) correction to the computed D 0 (CH) has two components: one relates to the dissociation limit and involves the correction for the splitting between the 3 P 0,1,2 states of carbon atom, the other to the molecular spin–orbit interaction in the 2 Π 1/2,3/2 ground state of methylidyne. There are no particular issues with the former component, which corresponds to the weighted average of the 3 P 0,1,2 states of carbon atom of 29.59 cm −1 77–79 and lowers the C + H dissociation asymptote by the same amount. However, as pointed out in some of the previous literature, 48,58 the correct molecular spin–orbit contribution to the energy – which must include coupling to the rotational angular momentum, a.k.a.…”

Assembly and intracellular transport of snRNP particles

“…lmmunoprecipitation of the 20s fraction brings down (in addition to the B protein), the D' core protein and a protein with a molecular weight of about 70kDa (Fig. 1. top panel, see arrow) which is not the U1-specific protein but may be a chaperone protein (Zieve,unpublished observation,51). In contrast to the other core proteins, the B protein has a bimodal distribution across the gradient with each peak being centered in the 5s-6s and 20s regions.…”