2011
DOI: 10.1002/acr.20632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS‐PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS‐ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
767
5
21

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,021 publications
(803 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(252 reference statements)
10
767
5
21
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the minimal detectable change (ie, minimal amount of change, outside of error, that reflects true change over 2 time points) of KOOS pain is 6 points. 34 For every cubic centimeter increase in BML volume of the medial compartment, the average difference in KOOS pain score was -0.48. Of this subset, 95% had medial BML volumes between 0 and 11.0 cm 3 and, thus, we could anticipate a difference of only -5.28 KOOS pain score points at most.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the minimal detectable change (ie, minimal amount of change, outside of error, that reflects true change over 2 time points) of KOOS pain is 6 points. 34 For every cubic centimeter increase in BML volume of the medial compartment, the average difference in KOOS pain score was -0.48. Of this subset, 95% had medial BML volumes between 0 and 11.0 cm 3 and, thus, we could anticipate a difference of only -5.28 KOOS pain score points at most.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The psychometric properties of the KOOS have been validated for the evaluation of knee injury. [32][33][34] Data Analysis A depression fracture as visualized on MRI has a strong relationship with traumatic BML volume, 7 but we hypothesized that it could also influence pain through other mechanisms; thus, we stratified our primary analysis for those with and those without a depression fracture. We used the Fisher exact test and independent-samples t tests to assess differences between participants with and participants without a depression fracture.…”
Section: Patient-reported Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A change in any of the subscales over 48 months was expressed as the difference between the absolute 48-month and baseline scores, with a negative value indicating clinical worsening. KOOS subscale worsening was considered to reliably represent a clinically relevant progression if the difference between the 48-month and the baseline exceeded the minimal detectable change (MDC) values, as previously described for the osteoarthritic knee [38]: pain ≥ 13; symptoms other than pain ≥ 16; sport and recreation function ≥ 20 and QOL ≥ 21.…”
Section: Clinical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 All patients were enrolled to undergo primary arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction. 18 The Lachman test is the most sensitive and the pivot shift the most specific test for the diagnosis of ACL rupture. 19 The Lachman test has become recognized as the most reliable noninvasive clinical method for determining the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were followed up for 6 months and functional outcome of the patients will be checked with IKDC scoring and Tegner Activity Score. 17,18 The Subjective IKDC scale was evaluated by summing the scores for the individual items and then transforming the score to a scale that ranges from 0 to 100. To calculate the final subjective IKDC score simply add the score of each item and divide by the maximum possible score which was 87.…”
Section: Postoperative Carementioning
confidence: 99%