Measuring Aggregated and Specific Combat Exposures: Associations Between Combat Exposure Measures and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Depression, and Alcohol‐Related Problems

Abstract

Research has shown combat exposure to be associated with negative mental health outcomes. Different combat exposure measures are not composed of the same combat experiences, and few combat exposure measures have been directly compared to another measure. Furthermore, research about the unique associations between specific combat experiences and mental health is lacking. We investigated associations between new-onset posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), new-onset depression, and alcohol-related problems and two commonly used measures of combat among a sample of 20,719 recently deployed U.S. military personnel. A 13-item measure assessed both direct and indirect combat exposures, and a 5-item measure assessed only indirect exposures. Both combat measures were associated with all outcomes in the same direction (e.g., PTSD, odds ratio [OR] = 2.97 vs. 4.01; depression, OR = 2.03 vs. 2.42; alcohol-related problems, OR = 1.41 vs. 1.62, respectively, for the 5- and 13-item measures). The 13-item measure had a stronger association with some outcomes, particularly PTSD. Each specific item had significant bivariate associations with all outcomes, ORs = 1.43-4.92. After adjusting for other combat exposures, items assessing witnessing abuse, feeling in danger, and knowing someone injured or killed remained associated with all outcomes, ORs = 1.18-2.72. After this adjustment, several items had unexpected protective associations with some mental health outcomes. Results indicated these two combat exposure measures were approximately equally effective for determining risk for negative mental health outcomes in a deployed population, despite having different content. Additional research is needed to replicate and understand how specific combat exposures affect health.

Posttraumatic stress disorder and risk of selected autoimmune diseases among US military personnel

“…While the DSM-IV was used because data collection pre-dated the publication of the DSM-5th edition (DSM-V), future studies should replicate these findings using DSM-V criteria. Combat was assessed from a measure with only 5 items; however, a recent study found that this combat measure performed similarly to a more detailed measure [37]. While the relatively short average length of follow-up reduced statistical power for examining potential effect modification and estimating relative risks specific to the rarer autoimmune diseases of interest, this limitation could be mitigated in future research incorporating extended follow-up of this cohort.…”

Longitudinal Investigation of Military-specific Factors Associated With Continued Unhealthy Alcohol Use Among a Large US Military Cohort

“…Deployment dates were provided by DMDC, and self-report of combat exposures was assessed at each follow-up based on at least 1 affirmative response to witnessing any of the following: a person's death due to war, disaster, or tragic event; instances of physical abuse; dead or decomposing bodies; maimed soldiers or civilians; or prisoners of war or refugees ( Porter et al, 2018 ). At each subsequent follow-up survey, participants were asked whether these experiences had occurred in “the last 3 years”; thus, reports of experiences could be linked with deployments occurring during the same 3-year interval.…”

Treatment of Depression With Alcohol and Substance Dependence: A Systematic Review

“…However, only 19% of these patients seek medical help for themselves, where most of them were alcohol dependence [ 4 ]. Despite the availability of information on the correlation between depression and SUD and/or alcohol dependence, their causality is still controversial [ 5 ]. The association between substance use and depression has been specified more significantly for some substances, including alcohol, cannabis, and opioids.…”