“…12,33 The validity and reliability of the CVM method in comparison with HW assessments have been investigated in a series of studies over the years, mainly through correlation and agreement coefficients, such as: ICC, Cohen's κ coefficient, Kendall's W coefficient, Pearson and Spearman correlation tests. 1,2,9,10,[16][17][18][34][35][36][37] Despite these previous studies, results considered the CVM maturation stages as valuable indicators of skeletal growth changes, 1,2,9,10,[16][17][18]34,36,37 the reproducibility concerning the difference between repeated measurements of each method against their mean has not been assessed directly. For this purpose, we used the Bland-Altman's plot 25 for evaluating how much the two method differed from each other.…”