2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69410-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring and Managing Operational Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AMA approach introduces the Loss Distribution Approach (LDA), Bootstrapping Approach, Bayesian Approach, and Extreme Value Theory (EVT) (Fuadi et al, 2020). According to Wang et al (2017) and Leone et al (2018), LDA is the most accurate and popular approach to measuring operational risk, well-defined, although it is very complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AMA approach introduces the Loss Distribution Approach (LDA), Bootstrapping Approach, Bayesian Approach, and Extreme Value Theory (EVT) (Fuadi et al, 2020). According to Wang et al (2017) and Leone et al (2018), LDA is the most accurate and popular approach to measuring operational risk, well-defined, although it is very complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have given confidence that LDA is the most recommended method by actuaries, considering that, in general, the available operational loss data is minimal (Leone et al, 2018). Thus, by simply compiling data on a specific frequency and severity distribution, Monte Carlo simulations can be carried out to obtain projections of future loss values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%