2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring exurban change in the American West: A case study in Gallatin County, Montana, 1973–2004

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The primarily strength of the Digitized Building data set is that it is more complete for periods prior to 1954. The Parcel Buildings data set Macon County, 1900-2007 is a more continuous temporal record, but contains no records of removed, replaced, or abandoned buildings, which are notably evident for dates prior to approximately 1965 (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Database Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primarily strength of the Digitized Building data set is that it is more complete for periods prior to 1954. The Parcel Buildings data set Macon County, 1900-2007 is a more continuous temporal record, but contains no records of removed, replaced, or abandoned buildings, which are notably evident for dates prior to approximately 1965 (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Database Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of methodologies for analyzing development patterns at landscape to regional scales that emphasize exurban development and the ability to differentiate development types. These methods include using aggregated and disaggregated census data to map development trends (Berube et al, 2006;Clark et al, 2009;Hammer, Stewart, Winkler, Radeloff, & Voss, 2004;Radeloff, Hagen, Voss, Field, & Mladenoff, 2000;Theobald, 2005); evaluating spatial characteristics using satelliteimage derived classifications and spatial indices (Compas, 2007;Irwin, Cho, & Bockstael, 2007); interpreting current and historic aerial photography to map trends of building locations (Kline, Azuma, & Moses, 2003;Leinwand et al, 2010;Martinuzzi, Gould, Ramos, & Ramos Gonzalez, 2007;Wear & Bolstad, 1998); extracting data from government sources such as county parcel records or permitting programs (Aspinall, 2004;Carlson & Dierwchter, 2007); or analyzing the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the inhabitants (Crump, 2003;Fernandez, Brown, Marans, & Nassauer, 2005). These differing approaches are often defined by the data availability and geographic scale of analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incluye técnicas como diferencia entre imágenes, regresión entre imágenes, proporción de imágenes, diferencias de índices de vegetación, análisis de vectores de cambio y sustracción de fondo. Estos algoritmos detectan los cambios mayores de ciertos umbrales identificados y proporcionan la información del cambio cuantitativamente en términos de reflectancia (USGS, 1999;Romero y López, 2000;Yagüe, 2002;Azocar, Sahueza y Henríquez, 2003;Catalán, et al, 2007;Compas, 2007;Zhang, et al, 2007;Chuvieco, 2008).…”
Section: Methods Of Analyzing Land-use Changeunclassified
“…It includes techniques such as image differencing, regression differencing, image ratioing, vegetation index differencing, change vector analysis and background subtraction. These algorithms detect changes over certain identified thresholds and provide change information quantitatively in terms of reflectance (USGS, 1999;Romero and López, 2000;Yagüe, 2002;Azocar, Sahueza and Henríquez, 2003;Catalán, et al, 2007;Compas, 2007;Zhang et al, 2007;Chuvieco, 2008).…”
Section: Methods Of Analyzing Land-use Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landscape shape index, PLADJ (class-specific contagion), and AI (internal like-adjacencies) all measure slightly different aspects of class aggregation [56]. These simple metrics have been used in many other studies including studies of urban landscape pattern and change over time [23,28,[57][58][59][60][61]. These metrics, and other similar metrics, have also been used by many ecological studies to document how ecosystems [62] or species respond to landscape pattern [14,63].…”
Section: Land Cover Composition and Configuration Over Timementioning
confidence: 99%